07 Jun '19 09:49>
@humy saidEven your math about millions of years and incrementally changing through evolution is a fairly tail that has nothing to do with reality. You have the numbers required over time, just for the formation of a cell? Evolutionary claims about small changes of already established lifeforms cannot give you any insight into something new useful and required to be formed. How many incrementally small changes did it take to build a liver for life that didn't have one to life that did and needed? You don't know your fairy tales are underpinned by 'millions of years' as if time is your savior for anything when it actually does nothing for you other than hide the fact you cannot prove your assertions.
No, because they aren't design. But if they were design then, yes, they surely would be bad design. For example, designing a giraffe neck vagus nerve to go from the brain to pointlessly loop around the heart and go back up the neck would be a very stupid thing to do that not even a half-wit of a human would likely do let alone a (hypothetical) all-knowing all-wise god!
[quote] ...[text shortened]... is no upper limit to the complexity evolution can incrementally create over many millions of years.
You have "I have checked this. There are no advantages." Really, are you sure?