@kellyjay said
You have issues just reading the lines.
All of your complaints if they are all found between the lines are just between your ears.
I listened to his speel and I CAN read between the lines. You just don't want to admit the bias inherent in all three of those posts.
That last dude took pains to show how we would NEVER be able to suss it all out, using such arguments as proteins have 10 to the ten BILLION number of combinations which is just a way to convince common folk of the impossibility for life to have ever come from a mud pit plus lightning or whatever happened in the natural universe not requiring a creator.
It would be one thing if the dude had said, it is frigging hard to figure out how life could have started on Earth naturally and here is where we are and here is how I think we will tackle this issue in the future, what direction I think we need to take to get closer to the answer.
He POINTEDLY did not say anything like that. He started out saying how impossible it was for life to have started naturally and ending the same way.
He proposed no way forward, he actually was proposing ways BACKWARDS.
That is not science, that is touting an agenda that denies science will NEVER figure it out.