23 Mar 20
@sonhouse saidThe catch is that it depends where the Earth bound observer is. You get a different answer at the equator from the one an observer at the poles, who is effectively stationary.
@humy
Still, it is an interesting intersection of SR and GR. I should have figured that one out on my own.
So generally that would stand for most any gravity well maybe outside of a black hole.
I wonder what the general solution for that would be? Where SR and GR are equal?
I've got to point out a concern with my calculation from a couple of pages ago. It seems not to matter in which direction the satellite is orbiting, with or against the rotation of the Earth, which is counter-intuitive, I'll have to have a look at that.
@metal-brain saidNo, what is hypocritical is of you making out to know better than the experts that know more about it than you or I while not being even able to show the basic maths.
You showed none. Your demand I show you math when you showed none yourself is hypocritical.
Neither of us know better than the experts and I always say so but I am not the one pretending to know better, YOU are. So I don't need to show the maths, YOU do.
If you cannot do the maths then you do NOT know better then they.
So, I demand again, where is your maths?
23 Mar 20
@deepthought saidArr I didn't think of that one!
The catch is that it depends where the Earth bound observer is. You get a different answer at the equator from the one an observer at the poles, who is effectively stationary.
23 Mar 20
@humy saidIf you won't show your math I won't show mine. I don't like your attempted double standard. You wreak of hypocrisy.
No, what is hypocritical is of you making out to know better than the experts that know more about it than you or I while not being even able to show the basic maths.
Neither of us know better than the experts and I always say so but I am not the one pretending to know better, YOU are. So I don't need to show the maths, YOU do.
If you cannot do the maths then you do NOT know better then they.
So, I demand again, where is your maths?
@metal-brain saidYou have none to show.
If you won't show your math I won't show mine.
My maths is whatever maths the experts would show and I don't pretend to know any better then they nor have maths any different from theirs on relativity (nor on anything else other than on a few things about statistical analysis, which is the rare exception on that).
I could copy and paste some of their maths and say their maths is the same as mine, which is the truth because I just listen to the experts. Is that what you want?
What was wrong with Deepthought's maths? He showed you his maths so why don't you show him your maths? Answer; you have none.