27 Nov '09 11:57>1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheaddid i pick the sequence of amino acids which make up the 'blueprint', for forming proteins, did I? no then what are you talking about? your argument is completely absurd and evasive for either you do not understand the relationship between amino acids and the proteins that their specific sequence provides the basis for or you are claiming that I sequenced their order to give credence to my argument.
Because you either don't get it, or don't want to get it.
[b]Why shall you not calculate what the probability of getting twenty from a hundred of the one kind in the correct sequence?
You can if you want, nobodies stopping you. My point is that if the 'correct sequence' is defined as 'the sequence you picked' then the probability is 1 or absolutel ne single cell with a number of pairs of DNA - and no intelligent agencies whatsoever.[/b]
as for the latter part of your argument it is seriously flawed and once again quite evasive, for until you can explain how the sequence of amino acids was arrived at, through a non intelligent agency all else is open to question.
you hold a degree in mathematics and yet you could not answer a relatively simply question with regard to probability with honesty and integrity and seemed intent to evade it with an irrelevant counter argument, my estimation of these ideas which has limited the search for truth to a non intelligent agency is now at an all time low.