Originally posted by Thequ1ck That's rich Seitse.
Want to stay on topic though?
I consider you as the departing point of the topic, because your opinions, or at least the opinions posted here, depart from a personal standpoint which is built on top of ideas and feelings developed throughout the person's life.
Originally posted by Seitse I consider you as the departing point of the topic, because your opinions, or at least the opinions posted here, depart from a personal standpoint which is built on top of ideas and feelings developed throughout the person's life.
Let me hear your pain, son.
Departing from scientific method so early Seitse?
I don't think you're meant to start with the conclusion.
It's OK that you believe me to be a liar. Palynka has
already talked me through this sort of motivation.
What did he call it? Oh yes, cognitive dissonance.
Originally posted by epiphinehas I'd like to discuss what evidence there is in support of homosexuality as a biologically and/or environmentally (prenatal) determined anomaly.
(2) http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/science/2008/December/Males-of-All-S ...[text shortened]... hape of the brain and the other with the effect pollution may have on the masculinity of males.
I believe most evidence points to homosexuality being a genetic trait, or at least a genetic predisposition.