Originally posted by Thequ1ck
So we need to reduce religion to a hypothesis or else eradicate it?
Suppose we do manage to hypothesise existence, what would the leading theory be?
So we need to reduce religion to a hypothesis or else eradicate it?
No that's not it at all.
Occam's razor is a simple principle that means when you try to explain something you try
to do so in the simplest terms possible to adequately explain a phenomena.
If two explanations offer equally good descriptions of a phenomena but one is simpler then
it is much easier to use and understand the simpler explanation than to use the more complex
one and the simpler explanation is more likely (but far from certainly) to be correct.
Now religion isn't just made up of explanations of phenomena, however any time religion does
postulate an explanation for something 9almost inevitably and universally a variant on 'god did it'
we can compare that 'hypothesis' against other competing hypotheses and first check to see which
more closely match reality, and then if two or more do match reality to the best of our ability to tell
we can chose among them using Occam's razor as a guide unless and until better evidence comes along.
However as I have explained many times before "God did it" is not actually an explanation at all...
All explanations MUST explain the new phenomena in terms of things already understood otherwise
all you are doing is moving the 'mystery' from the phenomena to the thing invoked to explain it.
As we have no idea what god is or how god works and in fact many theists define god in such a way as
to make such knowledge impossible to ever attain we do not and probably cannot understand god.
Thus god is an unknown and can't be used to explain anything.
.... But even if it was, as god and his 'ways' are defined as being infinitely vast and complex, the explanation
'god did it' is by definition the most complex explanation it is possible to give.
And thus will always be ruled against by Occam's razor until and unless EVERY other POSSIBLE explanation
has been conclusively ruled out.
And even then as an explanation it is utterly and completely useless as it is impossible to make any predictions
about anything based on the hypothesis 'god did it'.