06 Jul '20 18:42>2 edits
@medullah saidSo Medullah regards it as acceptable for DeepThought (a fellow Brit)
I have had few dealings with Deep Thought. Of the ones that I have had, I have found Deep Thought to be considered, courteous, and genuine. The notion of "attacking" them is a nonesense, and reflects your personal standards and inclinations. I can disagree with people and remain on good terms; unlike you I don't have to get into a war. Deep Thought is OK by me. ...[text shortened]... eap shots and wasting your clear intellect because you can't control that mean streak inside of you.
to write X but wrong and offensive for me to write the same thing
That shows Medullah's ad hominem nature in addition to a typical standard of tribal enmity at RHP.
Note that Medullah seemed enraged when I pointed out his blatant errors extolling Japan and Belarus in responding to the pandemic.
Does Medullah believe in attacking the person, not what the person writes?