@kazetnagorra said
No, it's not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction
Arr, yes, despite what I heard to the contrary on several flawed science documentaries on TV, which is probably where ignorant MB got that from, that is correct. The flawed demonstration I have seen on TV is the TV presenter suspending a pin against gravity with a magnet. And the reason why that is flawed is explained here;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction
"...Gravitation is by far the weakest of the four interactions at the
atomic scale, where electromagnetic interactions dominate. But the idea that the weakness of gravity can easily be demonstrated by suspending a pin using a simple magnet (such as a refrigerator magnet) is fundamentally
flawed. The only reason the magnet is able to hold the pin against the gravitational pull of the entire Earth is due to its relative proximity. There is clearly a short distance of separation between magnet and pin where a breaking point is reached, and due to the large mass of Earth this distance is disappointingly small.
Thus gravitation is very important for macroscopic objects and over macroscopic distances ..."
This shows one of the problems with the many TV science docs aimed at laypeople ; the presenters, even if they are themselves scientists, that try to explain it to them tend to oversimplify it or, worse, sometimes get the facts simply wrong! I have sadly seen that happen a lot. It often leads to many layperson misconceptions
(and I will on request give a list of a few if anyone here is interested? ). Don't know what can be done about that but I think something should be done about that.