1 edit
Originally posted by fmvI wonder.
Ever asked yourself if a person deserves to be insulted?
If there was a vote placed by RHP to see if anyone wanted shorter timeouts, how many would actually want it. I know alot fo non-subs would want it because they get their 6 games going and then they're stuck with nothing to do (fmv subsrcibe and see if the 100+ games will fill your need for fast moves), so with this in mind, I would leave this vote to those who put their money in.
I do believe, with a reasonable amount of certainty, that most subscribers won't want a faster timeout/timebank rate than the ones that are in place now. With this in mind, the need for more games will be the new goal for non-subs. So for this reason, you should subsrcibe, play more games, and enjoy the site.
I feel for you having your ability to play at faster sites blocked, but for obvious reasons your bosses decided they would rather their employees work with and on their computers rather than play on them.
So subscribe.
BTW did I mention you should subscribe, for more games and better odds of people moving far more frequently than what you already have? Yes I see I did.
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZAnd you ?
Did you even read a single page of the thread?
Of course I had ridden all pages of this thread.
I have seen some suggestions that may be resolved by something like my conclusion.
Is that a so big backward step ?
[Edit]I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.
Originally posted by Alain91If you had read the thread you'd know that every single person in the thread is saying that RHP is not the place for fast games.
And you ?
Of course I had ridden all pages of this thread.
I have seen some suggestions that may be resolved by something like my conclusion.
Is that a so big backward step ?
[Edit]I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZNot "every single person", you forgot the creator of this thread.
If you had read the thread you'd know that every single person in the thread is saying that RHP is not the place for fast games.
Originally posted by Alain91I will not insist.
I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.
Originally posted by Alain91You don't have to take insults from people.
Not "every single person", you forgot the creator of this thread.Originally posted by Alain91I will not insist.
I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.
People that insults generally lacks social competence and should be regarded as such.
Originally posted by Alain91So one person keeps asking, and after 6 pages everyone else is saying this site is not for fast games. You are still confused?
Not "every single person", you forgot the creator of this thread.Originally posted by Alain91I will not insist.
I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.
P-
1 edit
Originally posted by druidraviIn a word, tough.
I think the point he is trying to get across is uchess.com or any site which require continous transmission of data can't be played if your server blocks a port which requires that. Many companies do that. My university campus does that too...so if u want fast games u can't get them....
This is no reason why he should be bugging us about it.
Edit: You know, I've always wondered, exactly how much time do you save by leaving off the Y and O of "you"?? Even if I typed only the U in the three times I used "you" in that sentence, I don't think I'd have all that much extra free time in my day, but I would run the risk of being thought a fool *and* illiterate.
Originally posted by SuzianneYour post reminds me of monkeys, cold water and bananas for some reason. 😕
In a word, tough.
This is no reason why he should be bugging us about it.
Edit: You know, I've always wondered, exactly how much time do you save by leaving off the Y and O of "you"?? Even if I typed only the U in the three times I used "you" in that sentence, I don't think I'd have all that much extra free time in my day, but I would run the risk of being thought a fool *and* illiterate.
D