'Coz many r blocked, u'd b great to play onli...

Originally posted by Phlabibit
no one is this stupied.

P-

Ever asked yourself if a person deserves to be insulted?

Originally posted by fmv
Ever asked yourself if a person deserves to be insulted?

I wonder.

If there was a vote placed by RHP to see if anyone wanted shorter timeouts, how many would actually want it. I know alot fo non-subs would want it because they get their 6 games going and then they're stuck with nothing to do (fmv subsrcibe and see if the 100+ games will fill your need for fast moves), so with this in mind, I would leave this vote to those who put their money in.

I do believe, with a reasonable amount of certainty, that most subscribers won't want a faster timeout/timebank rate than the ones that are in place now. With this in mind, the need for more games will be the new goal for non-subs. So for this reason, you should subsrcibe, play more games, and enjoy the site.

I feel for you having your ability to play at faster sites blocked, but for obvious reasons your bosses decided they would rather their employees work with and on their computers rather than play on them.

So subscribe.







BTW did I mention you should subscribe, for more games and better odds of people moving far more frequently than what you already have? Yes I see I did.

Originally posted by druidravi
There is one site chessmaniac.com which offers 30 min a side correspondence game.
In this site 6 hours a side games are doable if you add timebank as well.

Thank You very much: it's not blocked and works well!

Hi fmv,
Hi everybody,
In fact, is the ideal something like 15 minutes of Timeout and 24 hours of Timebank ?

Originally posted by Alain91
Hi fmv,
Hi everybody,
In fact, is the ideal something like 15 minutes of Timeout and 24 hours of Timebank ?

Did you even read a single page of the thread?

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Did you even read a single page of the thread?

And you ?
Of course I had ridden all pages of this thread.
I have seen some suggestions that may be resolved by something like my conclusion.
Is that a so big backward step ?

[Edit]I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.

Originally posted by Alain91
If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.

What is official can get better. No need to brain storming to add an option of 12 or 6 hours and let people decide. Why not?

Originally posted by fmv
Ever asked yourself if a person deserves to be insulted?

Yes. Last time was 24 Oct '06 10:35.

P-

Originally posted by fmv
What is official can get better. No need to brain storming to add an option of 12 or 6 hours and let people decide. Why not?

Don't you have fast games to play someplace else?

P-

Originally posted by Alain91
And you ?
Of course I had ridden all pages of this thread.
I have seen some suggestions that may be resolved by something like my conclusion.
Is that a so big backward step ?

[Edit]I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.

If you had read the thread you'd know that every single person in the thread is saying that RHP is not the place for fast games.

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
If you had read the thread you'd know that every single person in the thread is saying that RHP is not the place for fast games.

Not "every single person", you forgot the creator of this thread.

Originally posted by Alain91
I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.

I will not insist.

Originally posted by Alain91
Not "every single person", you forgot the creator of this thread.

Originally posted by Alain91
I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.

I will not insist.

You don't have to take insults from people.

People that insults generally lacks social competence and should be regarded as such.

Originally posted by Alain91
Not "every single person", you forgot the creator of this thread.

Originally posted by Alain91
I do not want to offense anyone.
I'm just trying to give a "point of vue". If it is different than the official one, I will not insist.

I will not insist.

So one person keeps asking, and after 6 pages everyone else is saying this site is not for fast games. You are still confused?

P-

Originally posted by druidravi
I think the point he is trying to get across is uchess.com or any site which require continous transmission of data can't be played if your server blocks a port which requires that. Many companies do that. My university campus does that too...so if u want fast games u can't get them....

In a word, tough.

This is no reason why he should be bugging us about it.













Edit: You know, I've always wondered, exactly how much time do you save by leaving off the Y and O of "you"?? Even if I typed only the U in the three times I used "you" in that sentence, I don't think I'd have all that much extra free time in my day, but I would run the risk of being thought a fool *and* illiterate.

Originally posted by Suzianne
In a word, tough.

This is no reason why he should be bugging us about it.

Edit: You know, I've always wondered, exactly how much time do you save by leaving off the Y and O of "you"?? Even if I typed only the U in the three times I used "you" in that sentence, I don't think I'd have all that much extra free time in my day, but I would run the risk of being thought a fool *and* illiterate.

Your post reminds me of monkeys, cold water and bananas for some reason. 😕

D