The post that was quoted here has been removedNo, I'm not saying that.
I am saying that Crowley started a derogatory thread about a user.
That user then started a derogatory thread about Crowley.
Seems like event number two was the natural result of event number 1.
Frankly, in my opinion, both should have been taken down. If the first had been taken down in a timely fashion, maybe the second wouldn't have happened.
Originally posted by Red NightI may not be up to speed, but I think Crowley questioned VR's 'cyber tuffness'.
No, I'm not saying that.
I am saying that Crowley started a derogatory thread about a user.
That user then started a derogatory thread about Crowley.
Seems like event number two was the natural result of event number 1.
Frankly, in my opinion, both should have been taken down. If the first had been taken down in a timely fashion, maybe the second wouldn't have happened.
If I were to say, "YOU GOT THAT?!~" should I alert and removed everyone that cracks on ME for being Tuff?
WELL? ANSWER ME!
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitI think he did more than attack his cyber tuffness.
I may not be up to speed, but I think Crowley questioned VR's 'cyber tuffness'.
If I were to say, "YOU GOT THAT?!~" should I alert and removed everyone that cracks on ME for being Tuff?
WELL? ANSWER ME!
P-
VR didn't like the thread and that should have been enough in my opinion.
5 edits
The post that was quoted here has been removedActually Seiste started that little round with his "Personal Attack" on me, and don't even bother to ask me which thread that was, because you already know.
Crowley went out of his way to take part of a quote I said (to someone else I might add), and then starts a new thread with it. It sure looks personal to me, don't you think?
If you stop these things at the source, instead of leaving the thread up untill everyone has had a good look at it before removing it, it would stop a lot of the back and forth. ( again I use the Seiste,post)
Duecers was all in in fun it was "if" this and "if" that was all in fun..and Crowley knows that or you guys would have removed it, give it a break, this becomes more than just sillyness!
Who really is the Hypocrite would be quite a debate!!
But if you like the DRAMA, just leave everything as is I guess would be the answer. Perhaps not the correct one, but an answer!
2 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderWhat is your standard? Or is your standard, to just be the opposite of what everyone else is saying. 😛
That's your standard for moderation? IF 1 person "doesn't like a thread" it should be removed??
What do you think would make you a good mod? How nice and civilized you are to people?
Poking fun is ok, when it becomes a personal attack, yes it should always be removed!
1 edit
Originally posted by Very RustyGee when you talk, I can barely see RN's lips move!
What is your standard? Or is your standard, to just be the opposite of what everyone else is saying. 😛
What do you think would make you a good mod? How nice and civilized you are to people?
Poking fun is ok, when it becomes a personal attack, yes it should always be removed!
I'm abundantly fair and think moderation should be a last resort. That makes me qualified to moderate a Forum which is supposed to be free flowing (as all forums should be).
"Personal attacks" is the latest mantra of those who want to stifle expression on these Forums. What exactly that is is undefined and everyone just pours their preconceptions into that glass. Allowing hypersensitive users to define what gets allowed in the Forums is a sure way to make them even more boring than they presently are.
Originally posted by Red NightWhat are your thoughts about a new setting that would allow people to choose a particular forum based on different standards of moderation? For example, there would no reason for you to ever be upset about the forums not being the way you like because it is as clean and pure as you want. The ones who don't like moderation would have "fled the ship" so to speak.
Yes. I think if you start a thread that is a personal attack against someone and they complain about the attack it should be removed.
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderI have had my battles with Crowley in the forums and in PM's , and it came down to a vote between you and him which would never happen of course, because you wouldn't even be considered for a forum mod. 😛 I would VOTE for HIM in a heartbeat. That should tell you where you stand easily enough huh. 🙂
Gee when you talk, I can barely see RN's lips move!
I'm abundantly fair and think moderation should be a last resort. That makes me qualified to moderate a Forum which is supposed to be free flowing (as all forums should be).
"Personal attacks" is the latest mantra of those who want to stifle expression on these Fo ...[text shortened]... s allowed in the Forums is a sure way to make them even more boring than they presently are.
Why would you see RN's lips move when I talked? Are you slowly losing it?
Was that suppose to mean something? Don't beat around the bush, if you have something to say, say it like a man, if you can!
Originally posted by Very RustyI wouldn't expect that someone who supports RN's "Crybaby Standard" as a guide for Forum moderation would vote for me.
I have had my battles with Crowley in the forums and in PM's , and it came down to a vote between you and him which would never happen of course, because you wouldn't even be considered for a forum mod. 😛 I would VOTE for HIM in a heartbeat. That should tell you where you stand easily enough huh. 🙂
Why would see RN's lips move when I talked? Are you ...[text shortened]... ng? Don't beat around the bush, if you have something to say, say it like a man, if you can!