Non-subscribers don't know what they're missing

Originally posted by invigorate
Freeloaders must abide by basic restrictions.
$15 a year entry level wouldn't raise more revenue for the site.

You didn't answer my question about nonsubs bringing advert. money to the site for each hit. Is this true? How can a $15 sub not generate revenue and how can usage not be a factor?

Because Russ said so.

Originally posted by Ravello
No,I don't give a damn about commas because I'm not a geek like you who runs across chess sites to correct people's grammar and spelling.

Well, if you can't respect the language, how can you ask people to respect what you say with it?

(Not that it would make a big difference anyway.)

Ma vatten 'affanculo testa di cazzo,rispetta questo linguaggio se ci riesci.

This for your "language respect",you damned idiot.

Originally posted by Ravello
Ma vatten 'affanculo testa di cazzo,rispetta questo linguaggio se ci riesci.

What did you say?


Edit: Come back here and fight, you chicken!

Originally posted by Bowmann
Well, if you can't respect the language, how can you ask people to respect what you say with it?

(Not that it would make a big difference anyway.)

Bowmann, if respect is so damned important to you, particularly in language, then what's the deal with you intentionally scrambling up names when you reply?

Surely you realize it's a form of disrespect in almost every culture?

Which is exactly what you mean by doing it.

You are not as smart, clever, or amusing as you believe. Please, never subscribe. You are simply a parasite in these forums, and we'd all be better off if you went out and got run over by a beer truck.

Originally posted by RookRAK
...we'd all be better off if you went out and got run over by a beer truck.

That's interesting. I've never wished physical harm (or worse) on anyone.

Originally posted by King Scotty
You didn't answer my question about nonsubs bringing advert. money to the site for each hit. Is this true? How can a $15 sub not generate revenue and how can usage not be a factor?

Because more subsrcibers would pay $15 than non subscibers suddenly join at $15


I hope this answers your question.

At the moment I do not have time to play much more than 6 games (play them well, with proper analysis time, I mean). When I do, I will subscribe. Simple as that.

As many people have said before... if you want all the benefits, subscribe... if you just want a few games, dont.

Originally posted by welsharnie
As many people have said before... if you want all the benefits, subscribe... if you just want a few games, dont.

Simple as that!

Originally posted by welsharnie
As many people have said before... if you want all the benefits, subscribe... if you just want a few games, dont.

I play 2 or 3.

So I definitely shouldn't.

Originally posted by Bowmann
I play 2 or 3.

So I definitely shouldn't.

Thanks God,no one here wants idiots like you.

Originally posted by King Scotty
I don't know why you're fighting the idea??? You would probably sign up for a $15 sub.

I like the clarity of one subscription.

You seem to have gotten the idea that you need to make use of the subscriber only features to a certain extent to make full use of a subscription. You're wrong. As soon as you use any of the subscriber only features, you make full use of your subscription. Period.

This 'I need to get every penny's worth of my money' attitude is ridiculous when the price of a subscription is 30$ a year, especially if you base your definition of getting every penny's worth on those few users who use the site heavily.

Huh? You mean you guys actually still respond to this "site idea"?

Originally posted by schakuhr
Huh? You mean you guys actually still respond to this "site idea"?

No,I just like picking on KingCretin.