Originally posted by DoctorScribbles Hypothetically, would it be unethical for a Canadian to mate with a chinaman?
I need clarification, is it not feasible to believe that some Canadians are already Chinamen? Are you more concerned about racial purity or just raising the standard of living of Chinese Chinamen?
Originally posted by Phlabibit Are these 'roll-over' recs, so if we only give 8 we have 12 left to give the next month? Can we have a rec-count in our profile telling how many we have left to give out?
When I go on a shooting spree I like to know how many bullets I have in the clip.
P-
Also, if I don't use all my wrecks, can I sell them to someone else?
Originally posted by hopscotch Darvlay, would it be considered unethical to post links to image screenshots of a clan's private forums where they discuss such things as conspiring to recommend each other's posts to annoy other forum users and to basically ruin the rec system?
Originally posted by Phlabibit Are these 'roll-over' recs, so if we only give 8 we have 12 left to give the next month? Can we have a rec-count in our profile telling how many we have left to give out?
When I go on a shooting spree I like to know how many bullets I have in the clip.
P-
Phlabs: Remember the Seinfeld where Julia Louis Dreyfus was trying to decide if some guy was sponge worthy?
Your post was funny, but now that I have a limited supply of wrecks, I'm not sure it was sponge worthy.
Originally posted by Palynka Don't they have commas in their private forum?
Private forums don't have all the features of the public forums. Commas are not allowed there. Also, hopscotch is not allowed to spell properly in the private forums.
Originally posted by Phlabibit I'll take the whole case.
😉
P-
That was a good one and I might have given it a rec, but I'm still not sure it's sponge worthy.
This limit on the number of recs raises another issue; do we need to limit the number of RNSOA's.
They're already harder to get than a rec and more valuable too. Wouldn't want this governmentally imposed scarcity to cause an artificial decline in their value.
Originally posted by IM4Y2NV Of course it is fake, fake, fake, fake, and fake
I think you misunderstand.
Phlabibit was referring to post's 4 and 5 of this thread and your manipulated image of a forum to prove that it can be faked.
You then apologized when you realised how Russ felt about the recommended posts system being abused on this site.
Do you feel partly responsible for the abuse of the system?
Was your surprising reply to my post, proving that a screenshot can be faked, a weak attempt to defend one of your clans?
Originally posted by Red Night That was a good one and I might have given it a rec, but I'm still not sure it's sponge worthy.
This limit on the number of recs raises another issue; do we need to limit the number of RNSOA's.
They're already harder to get than a rec and more valuable too. Wouldn't want this governmentally imposed scarcity to cause an artificial decline in their value.
Go get a job or a hobby or something. You're freaking me out.
20 Sep '06 20:27
Recommendation Limit
Back to Top