Go back
3, 7, 12  and 40

3, 7, 12 and 40

Spirituality


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
more drivel
The only drivel here is your, now quite standard, inability to answer straightforward questions.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You will have of course read Jason BeDuhn's book and can proffer an objective assessment of his findings.
I've just spent a rather interesting 'scholarly' interlude working my way through the very cogently argued "Appendix: The Use of 'Jehovah' in the NWT" from Jason BeDuhn's book "Truth in Translation". Have you read it, robbie?



Originally posted by Proper Knob
The only drivel here is your, now quite standard, inability to answer straightforward questions.
I am under no duress to answer anything that I consider to be slobber, drool, drivel or inane babbling and in fact as a Christian I am counselled by the scriptures to avoid it. Now did you have something to contribute to the subject or will you continue with your vanity?


-Removed-
more slobber and unworthy of anyone's attention.

2 edits

Originally posted by FMF
I've just spent a rather interesting 'scholarly' interlude working my way through the very cogently argued "Appendix: The Use of 'Jehovah' in the NWT" from Jason BeDuhn's book "Truth in Translation". Have you read it, robbie?
Have I read Jason BeDhuns book, yes on numerous occasions. Once through from beginning to end and in parts where it was pertinent to debate.




-Removed-
stop posting slobber and i wont call you out for posting slobber, its not difficult, post something with content instead of your usual petty and inane drivel.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Have I read Jason BeDhuns book, yes on numerous occasions. Once through from beginning to end and in parts where it was pertinent to debate.
If you have read the pertinent section of "Truth in Translation" [i.e. Appendix: The Use of 'Jehovah' in the NWT] "on numerous occasions", then why - on page 4 of this thread - did you claim that "Jason BeDhunn does not reference any of them specifically" (meaning the 237 uses of "Jehovah" in the NT), when this not true?


2 edits

Originally posted by FMF
If you have read the pertinent section of "Truth in Translation" [i.e. Appendix: The Use of 'Jehovah' in the NWT] "on numerous occasions", then why - on page 4 of this thread - did you claim that "Jason BeDhunn does not reference any of them specifically" (meaning the 237 uses of "Jehovah" in the NT), when this not true?
it was a long time ago someone lent me the book. I made a mistake, clearly he does reference specific verses. Is this pettiness really all you have to offer or will you make an attempt to actually say something with content?


-Removed-
more inane drivel.



-Removed-
more nothingness.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.