Go back
@Divegeester

@Divegeester

Spirituality


Originally posted by chaney3
Atheists, as of now, will be held accountable.
Held "accountable" to whom? By whom?


Originally posted by FMF
What sort of thing would atheists have to say in order to "prove themselves" to you?
Atheists, including Ghost, say they require proof of God.

What proof?

Close minded people will refute God even if He appeared right in front of them.

"Arrogant Atheist".
That's Ghost.


Originally posted by chaney3
Close minded people will refute God even if He appeared right in front of them.
And you believe this applies to Ghost of a Duke despite everything he has said since he arrived in this community?


Originally posted by chaney3
Atheists, including Ghost, say they require proof of God.

What proof?

Close minded people will refute God even if He appeared right in front of them.

"Arrogant Atheist".
That's Ghost.
You seem to have overlooked the question you were ostensibly replying to:

What sort of thing would atheists have to say in order to "prove themselves" to you?


Originally posted by FMF
And you believe this applies to Ghost of a Duke despite everything he has said since he arrived in this community?
Yes.

Yourself included.


Originally posted by chaney3
Close minded people will refute God even if He appeared right in front of them. "Arrogant Atheist". That's Ghost.
What makes you say Ghost of a Duke would "refute God even if He appeared right in front of [him]"?


Originally posted by chaney3
Now, when speaking to believers, you refer to those past beliefs as 'God figures'.
What objection do you have to the expression "god figure"?


Originally posted by FMF
What objection do you have to the expression "god figure"?
You are a hypocrite!!!


Originally posted by FMF
What makes you say Ghost of a Duke would "refute God even if He appeared right in front of [him]"?
Ghost would casually shrug off God as an illusion that was "probable" after a billion years.

No proof would ever suffice.

1 edit

Originally posted by chaney3
You are a hypocrite!!!
"Hypocrite"? How so?

When you consider how many different versions of "god" that even just Christians have, let alone people of other religions, then that divine figure and its perceived role and actions in the context of those varying sets of beliefs cannot be lumped together.

sonship's/Kelly Jay's god figure is a 'torturer god' who incinerates non-believers for eternity; Suzianne and divegeester's god figure does no such thing. Others believe that Jesus was their god figure incarnate; others believe their god figure has never been incarnate.

These are fundamentally different divine characters. They are different god figures. I think the expression "god figure" is neutral and presupposes nothing about what different believers actually believe when they talk about "god".


Originally posted by chaney3
Ghost would casually shrug off God as an illusion that was "probable" after a billion years. No proof would ever suffice.
It sounds to me like you either [1] don't read Ghost of a Duke's posts, or [2] you are just trying to draw attention to yourself and you want to attract his attention in particular, presumably because he's shown little inclination to indulge you when you are boringly drunk, and has said so. Your posts make you sound rankled but with nothing interesting to say, a combination that can seem cutting edge to someone who's posting while boozing. But it's not.


Originally posted by FMF
"Hypocrite"? How so?

When you consider how many different versions of "god" that even just Christians have, let alone people of other religions, then that divine figure and its perceived role and actions in the context of those varying sets of beliefs cannot be lumped together.

sonship's/Kelly Jay's god figure is a 'torturer god' who incinerates non-beli ...[text shortened]... presupposes nothing about what different believers actually believe when they talk about "god".
My extreme dispute with atheists is creation. They believe in nothing.

It doesn't matter whether it's God, Jesus, Buddha, Allah, etc.

Prove to me that life came from nothing.

Atheists cannot do that and must be called out on it.


Originally posted by FMF
It sounds to me like you either [1] don't read Ghost of a Duke's posts, or [2] you are just trying to draw attention to yourself and you want to attract his attention in particular, presumably because he's shown little inclination to indulge you when you are boringly drunk, and has said so. Your posts make you sound rankled but with nothing interesting to say, a combination that can seem cutting edge to someone who's posting while boozing. But it's not.
Moron.
You could not be more wrong.


Originally posted by chaney3
My extreme dispute with atheists is creation. They believe in nothing.

It doesn't matter whether it's God, Jesus, Buddha, Allah, etc.

Prove to me that life came from nothing.

Atheists cannot do that and must be called out on it.
You have ignored the content of my post which was about my use of the term "god figure".

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chaney3
You are a hypocrite!!!
In this thread alone sir it is possible to witness your embarrassing decent into drunkenness:

At 21:19pm you actually post something quite witty, but around this time pop open your particular brand of poison.

By 03:25am you are posting "Are you mocking me? Doesn't matter. Just like America has put Iran "On Notice", I am putting atheists "On Notice".

By 05:34am we have "I am at war with weak atheists.Like you!!!"

And finally 07:55am (before throwing up and passing out on the rug) you somehow manage to type "Moron. You could not be more wrong."


How's the hangover?