29 Oct '14 10:16>2 edits
Originally posted by FMFI don't care if dive bashes ideologies. Do you have a problem understanding English?
Is it right to "bash" the ideology that claims non-believers are burned for eternity in agony?
Originally posted by josephwEnglish is my native tongue. And ~ in English ~ you appear to be saying BOTH that claiming "non-believers are burned for eternity in agony" is a distortion of the damnation aspect of your ideology AND you are apparently not confronting any Christians who believe and assert explicitly that "non-believers are burned for eternity in agony" is a key part of your Christianity. The issue is not my understanding, the issue is your ambiguous stance on the notion that "non-believers are burned for eternity in agony".
I don't care if dive bashes ideologies. Do you have a problem understanding English?
Originally posted by checkbaiterWhat is the purpose of "the dread of God" if it cannot extort supposed "love" and if its threat cannot make someone believe something that they simply don't believe?
I don't care how they view wisdom, It is the love of God, the goodness of God that leads man to repentance, not the dread of God.
Originally posted by FMFDid you dread your wife before you loved her?
What is the purpose of "the dread of God" if it cannot extort supposed "love" and if its threat cannot make someone believe something that they simply don't believe?
Originally posted by checkbaiterSo I take it you are not claiming there is any legitimate moral content in these "gangster" notions ~ it's just a superstitious 'might is right' thing, am I hearing you right?
Death is forever, no afterlife, other than being resurrected for a short time and then die again by fire. God has provided a way out. He makes the rules, take it or leave it.
Originally posted by checkbaiterMy wife ~ whom I love ~ has never threatened to torture me in burning agony forever, if that's what you're getting at.
Did you dread your wife before you loved her?
Originally posted by FMFI'm not sure what you are meaning here, but sin has consequences not only later, but here and now.
So I take it you are not claiming there is any legitimate moral content in these "gangster" notions ~ it's just a superstitious 'might is right' thing, am I hearing you right?
Originally posted by FMFWhy do you keep addressing me as someone who believes in eternal torture? Haven't you been reading?
My wife ~ whom I love ~ has never threatened to torture me in burning agony forever, if that's what you're getting at.
What is the purpose of "the dread of God" if it doesn't inspire love and doesn't inspire belief ~ which is and has been the case for billions and billions of people?
Originally posted by checkbaiter
Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
If Revelation were to be understood literally then you might be correct. However, Revelation is a book of symbols.
Revelation 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus C ...[text shortened]... e or tormented.
http://www.thisisyourbible.com/index.php?page=questions&task=show&mediaid=678
Death cannot be literally cast into a lake of fire
Hell cannot be literally cast into a lake of fire
The Beast which theoretically could be cast into a lake of fire cannot be understood as a literal beast.
Originally posted by checkbaiterYou propagate a similar notions of might-is-right vengeance for thoughtcrimes which strike me as morally repugnant and far-fetched. if you are telling me I will die when I die and that will be that, then you are telling me nothing new. If you are telling me that you, on the other hand, are for all intents and purposes immortal then you are offering no reason for me to believe you other than that you read something in a book and it has captured your imagination.
Why do you keep addressing me as someone who believes in eternal torture? Haven't you been reading?
Originally posted by FMF
You propagate a similar notions of might-is-right vengeance for thoughtcrimes which strike me as morally repugnant and far-fetched. if you are telling me I will die when I die and that will be that, then you are telling me nothing new. If you are telling me that you, on the other hand, are for all intents and purposes immortal then you are offering no rea ...[text shortened]... o believe you other than that you read something in a book and it has captured your imagination.
If you are telling me that you, on the other hand, are for all intents and purposes immortal then you are offering no reason for me to believe you other than that you read something in a book and it has captured your imagination.
Originally posted by JS357The Bible supports eternal punishment? Really?
The RCC refers to itself as the church.
I (a non-theist) have reported on the stated creed of a small 'sect' the Missouri synod of the Lutheran church, and the RCC , with 1.2 billion, both attesting to the belief in eternal punishment, and yet do you find sonship's response still heretical? It is clearly a mainstream opinion, the RCC being what it is, and L ...[text shortened]... ts eternal punishment. One must become a non-Biblical universalist to get past this. Just do it.