1. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    10 Jun '14 07:20
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    If you take it out of context, yes. But what I write here is on-topic. And that's about the girl. This girl would have been dead by now if her parents religion was honoured. Hence "religion (their) killes (by this example)".

    There are many more examples where religion kills, but that would be off-topic.
    There are also many examples where religion save ...[text shortened]... hat my sometimes (often?) lack of English grammar and vocabulary shows. Thank you for this! 🙂 )
    "Context" usually requires more than a 5-word post. 😛
  2. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    10 Jun '14 07:591 edit
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    "Context" usually requires more than a 5-word post. 😛
    Yes, you're right, but this context spans from the first posting in this thread, the link included.

    And, of course, it was a bit provocative, just to heat up the discussion.

    She survived, despite religion, what a joy! Right?
    (Even that her parents weren't equally happy...)
  3. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157803
    10 Jun '14 08:53
    Originally posted by divegeester
    You're missing the point again (and now I'm pretty sure you do it deliberately) by talking in generalities rather than addressing the specific topic.

    You are making all these grandstanding sweeping statements, but answer this specific point: Do you think the state should have let the girl (mentioned on the OP) die by not intervening? Yes or no?
    Now listen, so far in this thread you have made it a point to tell someone
    that even though they think something is a sin, you are happy about the
    state forcing them into it, you are gleeful about the whole thing. The whole
    point of this is to rub their nose in it! Now you have twice now said I am
    being deliberately dishonest in that I'm missing the point on purpose, so I
    guess that is another way of saying I'm lying! You need to figure out even
    if we were in agreement how much hate is driving you in this discussion
    it most certainly isn't out of love you are doing it.

    Yes, if it goes against a religion the state should not force it.

    Would I argue on the state's behalf to try and get the girl what she needs,
    yes I would.
    Kelly
  4. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157803
    10 Jun '14 08:57
    Originally posted by FMF
    In terms of this OP, what "sin" are you referring to?
    If you don't do anything in faith it is sin, and if anyone for example eats
    meat that believes they should not it would be sin to them, if you worship
    on a certain day of the week and feel compelled to do so, to do otherwise
    would be sin to them. Neither of those things would be sin to me, but I
    would most certainly respect them for their souls sake.
    Kelly
  5. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    10 Jun '14 09:48
    Originally posted by KellyJay
    ... if anyone for example eats meat that believes they should not it would be sin to them...
    So in the context of the supposed 'sin factor' in the scenario in the OP, say, strictly vegetarian parents ~ who happen to think eating meat is a "sin" ~ can let their child die for want of some meat, without having done anything immoral or "sinning", in your view?
  6. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    10 Jun '14 09:51
    Originally posted by KellyJay
    Yes, if it goes against a religion the state should not force it.
    Do you think that it is every parent's right to simply let their child die and that nobody has the right to intervene?
  7. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157803
    10 Jun '14 10:22
    Originally posted by FMF
    So in the context of the supposed 'sin factor' in the scenario in the OP, say, strictly vegetarian parents ~ who happen to think eating meat is a "sin" ~ can let their child die for want of some meat, without having done anything immoral or "sinning", in your view?
    Life is full of choices. As I pointed out to you I have no issue with food or
    holidays. I do care about what goes on in people lives, and forcing them
    to do anything against they will isn't something I'm for. Letting a child die,
    when you can help, I'd help! If you were put in a place where you could
    save someone by doing something in your mind was evil, would you? Now
    keep in mind once you open that door than anything can be justified, and
    the choices cut both way as soon as you say never nothing may be saved.
    Kelly
  8. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157803
    10 Jun '14 10:22
    Originally posted by FMF
    Do you think that it is every parent's right to simply let their child die and that nobody has the right to intervene?
    I've answer that already, and explained why too.
    Kelly
  9. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    10 Jun '14 10:33
    Originally posted by KellyJay
    As I pointed out to you I have no issue with food or holidays. I do care about what goes on in people lives, and forcing them to do anything against they will isn't something I'm for. Letting a child die, when you can help, I'd help!
    You don't claim the right for yourself, I get that, and you would give food to a child, I know that, but you support the right of parents to let their children die for the want of food, yes?
  10. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    10 Jun '14 10:34
    FMF: Do you think that it is every parent's right to simply let their child die and that nobody has the right to intervene?

    Originally posted by KellyJay
    I've answer that already, and explained why too.
    So do you support abortion rights?
  11. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    95105
    10 Jun '14 11:06
    Originally posted by KellyJay
    I've answer that already, and explained why too.
    Kelly
    a child has been possessed by the spirit of the evil african devil catoplebas. unless the child is starved to death, catoplebas will come forth into our world causing the death of billions. the parents decide that it would be a sin against the sky god mulungu and humanity if they didnt starve the child to death...

    ..should the state stand back and allow them to do it?
  12. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157803
    10 Jun '14 11:24
    Originally posted by FMF
    So do you support abortion rights?
    I'm prolife. I will argue and discuss it, but in the end as with all of our
    choices people are going to do what they are going to do, with or without
    the law. Do you believe abortion rights is a religion?
    Kelly
  13. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157803
    10 Jun '14 11:25
    Originally posted by FMF
    You don't claim the right for yourself, I get that, and you would give food to a child, I know that, but you support the right of parents to let their children die for the want of food, yes?
    If it was up to me, I'd get them the food they could eat.
    Kelly
  14. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    10 Jun '14 11:27
    Originally posted by KellyJay
    Do you believe abortion rights is a religion?
    What do you mean? If I declare an abortion to be a religious act,you will support it?
  15. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157803
    10 Jun '14 11:28
    Originally posted by FMF
    What do you mean? If I declare an abortion to be a religious act,you will support it?
    No, as I would not support, not getting blood transfusions either.
    Kelly
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree