A life saved from the madness

Originally posted by stellspalfie
do you agree that there needs to be a line?

yes, across your forehead with the words, REJECT stamped on it 😛

Originally posted by stellspalfie
do you agree that there needs to be a line?

Sure, who gets to set it?
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
Sure, who gets to set it?
Kelly

governments representing the general consensus should draw the lines.

who do you think should draw the lines?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
governments representing the general consensus should draw the lines.

who do you think should draw the lines?

Maybe the Christian Church.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
governments representing the general consensus should draw the lines.

who do you think should draw the lines?

works for me
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
works for me
Kelly

you have said several times that the parents should decide the fate of a child in relation to the use of life saving blood. your new comment seems to contradict this.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
you have said several times that the parents should decide the fate of a child in relation to the use of life saving blood. your new comment seems to contradict this.

If you have a LAW that says this person can choose for themselves
it basically takes it out of the parents hands now doesn't it? You can
still have views against the state doing that; however, if you act against
the state which you have the power to do that, but you must be willing
to accept what occurs when you do, it will come with cost.
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
If you have a LAW that says this person can choose for themselves
it basically takes it out of the parents hands now doesn't it? You can
still have views against the state doing that; however, if you act against
the state which you have the power to do that, but you must be willing
to accept what occurs when you do, it will come with cost.
Kelly

earlier you stated that we should draw a line and not let governments get involved in a parents right to decide what happens medically to their children (using examples of governments already having too much power)...........you then appeared to agree that governments should draw the line and not parents.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
earlier you stated that we should draw a line and not let governments get involved in a parents right to decide what happens medically to their children (using examples of governments already having too much power)...........you then appeared to agree that governments should draw the line and not parents.

I still hold that view, but as near as I can tell it was not the rule of law
that was used to take away what the parents wanted they just did it.
The law is something we should obey, if the government sets some
standard that goes against my faith, then I'll pay the price for not obeying
the law. I never said I want to do away with government laws, but those
laws should not take away our rights. The age of consent is a common
thing among men. I think the government should set that in my opinion.
Kelly

-Removed-

I really don't think murder is the right word.

-Removed-

I'm going to tell you this just once more, stop saying I support murder.
I do not!
I support people walking out their faith!
It isn't clear or a sure thing that if you get a medical treatment or get
denied one you will live or die.
Your hate filled speech is getting old.
Kelly