Originally posted by stellspalfie
the details are very important. hence why we keep asking you to aviod speaking in generalisations and to be precise about what you actually think.
so, if you think the government should step in and remove a child from a family where the childs health is in danger. would you add a note saying 'unless the childs health is in danger due to religious beliefs of the parents'? or would it need to be more specific? how would you word it?
I am being as clear as possible for the reasons we have gone over and
over ad nauseam. As quick as you or I draw those lines, then the fight is
on you can be called favoring murder if you are not seen as in complete
agreement with someone else no matter how many times you say that
is not true.
I do believe the government should setup laws to protect everyone,
what else are laws for except for that, not just children but everyone.
That said as soon as you start down the path of saying how, then toes
start getting stepped on.
My complaint was causing someone to sin, even the doctors will act
out trying to do the right thing for the right reasons in their eyes, but
that does not mean they can do whatever they want to anyone else,
there are lines when the doctors get to they should back off. Those that
are setting up laws for the government will be (we hope) setting up
laws that will be there for everyone’s protection.
I told you from the onset, I do my best to respect everyone else’ views
and have been demonized for that position. Draw some lines and pretty
much anything you say can be used to abuse someone.
Kelly