Originally posted by jammer
Some (many) atheists belive in Moral Relativism .. it's the view that ethical standards, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person's individual choice.
We can all decide what is right for ourselves.
You decide what's right for you, and I'll decide what's right for me. Moral relativism says, "It's tr ...[text shortened]... his definition from a website.
http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/moral-relativism.htm
This is what could be said to be "a Hollywood version of moral relativism": the individual choosing his or her moral standards. Perhaps a more sophisticated way of approaching this subject is to note that a moral relativist's main point is usually that moral values are culturally determined, and an individual pretty much adopts or internalizes the values of the culture he or she lives in. So, the much emphasized freedom of choice doesn't necessarely play such an important role here. Of course, this viewpoint can be subjected to criticism as well as other ethical theories.
It is clearly the christian theist for example, rather than the moral relativist, who argues that "It's true for me, if I believe it."
And, to comment the original question, I have very little idea what is meant here by "absolute moral". But an atheist can believe in justice, equality, revolution etc. or why not in Kantian imperative. Could ethical principles based on those things be considered "absolute" as well as the moral rules set by God?