Originally posted by FabianFnasSure science changes, so to take someones word such as you quoted isn't very trustworthy it would seem. How do they know something when they weren't there to begin with? Seems really silly to take it seriously...
Right, the story has been the same since they wrote the Genesis part of the bible.
Science evolves and take new findings into considerations.
Originally posted by galveston75And yet the word of a few nineteenth century men on how best to read badly translated Hebrew endures, despite advances in science and better historical knowledge of the Hebrew world from which the sacred texts emerged.
Well go ahead and believe mans word which is wrong often and will proabaly change many times. Don't the encylopedias have to be updated every year? God word tells a different story that never changes.
Stunning!
Originally posted by galveston75Ah, therefore you can deny the six days of creation, because noone was there to witness it? Good.
Sure science changes, so to take someones word such as you quoted isn't very trustworthy it would seem. How do they know something when they weren't there to begin with? Seems really silly to take it seriously...
Creationism is dead, long live evolution!
(Thank you for this proof!)
- Joined
- 07 Mar 09
- Moves
- 32473
Originally posted by galveston75When you get to hell will you find out that Fomenko was right and the bible you believed in was a lie concocted by men? "Experts" might say otherwise but we know they are always wrong.
Well go ahead and believe mans word which is wrong often and will proabaly change many times. Don't the encylopedias have to be updated every year? God word tells a different story that never changes.
Originally posted by TerrierJackLol, he doesn't actually profess belief in a hell, you may want to try again!
When you get to hell will you find out that Fomenko was right and the bible you believed in was a lie concocted by men? "Experts" might say otherwise but we know they are always wrong.
- Joined
- 07 Mar 09
- Moves
- 32473
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDoh! I forgot! There are no consequences for disbelief! If so, then why not believe that Darwin was right? (Or Fomenko!) Heck, why not cut out the middle man and worship Satan directly? (Forgot again! That's what catholics already do!)
Lol, he doesn't actually profess belief in a hell, you may want to try again!
Originally posted by TerrierJackThere's hell, because they weren't right, what middle man? Because it's a sin, NO WE DON'T!
Doh! I forgot! There are no consequences for disbelief! If so, then why not believe that Darwin was right? (Or Fomenko!) Heck, why not cut out the middle man and worship Satan directly? (Forgot again! That's what catholics already do!)
Originally posted by FabianFnasWrong again, no you don't if you refuse to Believe you pay the consequences, no everybody dies, gets judged, goes to Heaven, Hell or Purgatory.
Only christians can go to hell. You have to believe there is a hell to go there. Others just die happy.
Originally posted by TerrierJackoh there are consequences, they just do not take the form of eternal torment, as if God was some kind of a torturer!
Doh! I forgot! There are no consequences for disbelief! If so, then why not believe that Darwin was right? (Or Fomenko!) Heck, why not cut out the middle man and worship Satan directly? (Forgot again! That's what catholics already do!)
Originally posted by menace71I'm just wondering because the notion that the Americas were peopled by folks coming across the South Atlantic, perhaps Israelites, is an old story, confirmed by the unearthing of some no longer extant golden tablets in the 1820s.
Not me 🙂
Manny
That view seems to run against the deceptions of science.
1 edit
Originally posted by PBE6I don't know what color they were or even if they were both of the same pigmentation.
Were they black?
Doesn't adam have in its definition "red earth"? I thought I recall that.
Anyway, they were naked and felt no shame about it, until they sinned.