Originally posted by @romans1009Your manner owes a lot to online disinhibition syndrome, I think.
No reason to get saucy. If you have a full bladder and don’t want to discuss substance, feel free to start whizzing in the pool again.
I’ve got to go anyway.
Have a great day!
Originally posted by @fmfNot what I said - I see the misrepresentation (i.e. whizzing) has started. I said I suspect I know the answer to the Yes/No part - obviously you think the “story” was invented. I never said I knew why you thought that.
If you are, as you say, curious about "why", then read the ongoing thread that I mentioned. That you already suspect that you know what I have written there is duly noted.
Everyone get out of the pool!
Originally posted by @romans1009Your exact words were: I already suspect I know the answer to the Yes/No question, but was curious about why, so the Yes/No part was just to affirm what I already suspected.
Not what I said - I see the misrepresentation (i.e. whizzing) has started. I said I suspect I know the answer to the Yes/No part - obviously you think the “story” was invented. I never said I knew why you thought that.!
My answer to your claim that you were "curious about why" is:
If you are, as you say, curious about "why", then read the ongoing thread that I mentioned.
Originally posted by @secondsonNot interested in your question. I thought that was clear. If I thought ~ even for one fleeting moment ~ that you actually did have any real information about "Life everlasting", I would be asking you about it proactively and not just fielding your questions.
Not interested in what? Life everlasting?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe trollmaster appears!
I find it hilarious he begins all his accounts keen to project an image akin to sonship, but soon descends into Robbie.
Are you stalking me, trollmaster? I’m flattered!
You do tend to ride the same hobby horse, though. Maybe try a little variety in your trolling? Variety is the spice of life!
Originally posted by @fmfSo you’re not open to the possibility that you’re wrong? You think you have all the answers?
Not interested in your question. I thought that was clear. If I thought ~ even for one fleeting moment ~ that you actually did have any real information about "Life everlasting", I would be asking you about it proactively and not just fielding your questions.
That kind of an ego fits perfectly with atheists I’ve encountered online and is a real stumbling block to knowing God. Did you have that kind of ego when you examined the evidence for Christ’s divinity or did it manifest itself later?
Originally posted by @romans1009Well, my answer when you asked this TWICE before less than an hour ago, on this thread, was "yes". Did you really not read what I said?
So you’re not open to the possibility that you’re wrong?
Originally posted by @romans1009Generally speaking in life? No. Do I have all the answers to the kinds of things someone of your calibre asks me on a message board? Yes, pretty much.
You think you have all the answers?
Originally posted by @romans1009Not interested in this kind of conversation. You appear to me to have quite the chip on your shoulder and it affects the content and tone of your posts. You may find after a month or so of this, if you want to have somewhat more edifying conversations with people here, you 'll need to come back with a different screen name and start afresh.
That kind of an ego fits perfectly with atheists I’ve encountered online and is a real stumbling block to knowing God. Did you have that kind of ego when you examined the evidence for Christ’s divinity or did it manifest itself later?
Originally posted by @fmfIf you’re open to the possibility that you’re wrong, why not actively pursue an answer to whether God exists and whether Jesus Christ was God in the flesh? Why not question the evidence?
Well, my answer when you asked this TWICE before less than an hour ago, on this thread, was "yes". Did you really not read what I said?
Originally posted by @fmfSo we’re back to this again.
Not interested in this kind of conversation. You appear to me to have quite the chip on your shoulder and it affects the content and tone of your posts. You may find after a month or so of this, if you want to have somewhat more edifying conversations with people here, you 'll need to come back with a different screen name and start afresh.
Anytime someone tries to discuss substance with you, you dip your big toe in the pool but then get scared and start whizzing in it.
Jump in, the water’s fine!