Originally posted by FMF"The twhithead I'm used to arguing with is better than this."
Can you explain how you think the post you were responding to constituted "denigration"?
Meaning, of course, "the twhitehead that sometimes agrees with me is a much better person than this scum who dares to disagree with me."
And yes, I've used hyperbole to highlight what I mean, just in case your blinders prevent you from seeing anything he says in a non-biased light.
Originally posted by SuzianneWhere did divegeester suggest that twhitehead is "scum"? Isn't "scum" a word you have introduced and not divegeester?
[b]"The twhithead I'm used to arguing with is better than this."
Meaning, of course, "the twhitehead that sometimes agrees with me is a much better person than this scum who dares to disagree with me."
And yes, I've used hyperbole to highlight what I mean, just in case your blinders prevent you from seeing anything he says in a non-biased light.[/b]
1 edit
-Removed-I was referring to the post I was replying to as I believed that that was the post you were referring to as well.
Don't believe me? Then give me a good explanation as to how you referring to a post several pages ago makes sense in context. You said I am dodging by accusing you of trolling. You didn't say I 'was dodging'.
-Removed-Now you are just being deliberately obnoxious.
You asked me what definition I wanted to use. I gave one. Now you are dissatisfied that I gave an answer as that doesn't fit with your 'your trolling' claim.
As for the second part it wasn't a definition I disagreed with, it was a claim. I do not believe that reproduction is inherently selfish behaviour.
The divegeester I know has always been this ridiculous when we have a discussion because for some reason my logic rubs him the wrong way.
-Removed-Huh? Emulating FMJ perhaps?
You claim that you support the Wiki definition but don't accept the qualification around "selfish" parenting from Wiki - and this is my point. Your own parenting comes from a place of self interest not altruism. Wiki disagrees with you, I disagree with you.
So you are both wrong. Interestingly you cannot actually defend your claim hence your ridiculous behaviour.