Go back
angels

angels

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
So then we will maybe have certain Christians going around saying "Christianity is NOT a religion" and then maybe some of the same Christians going around saying "Atheism IS a religion".
You got it. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You got it. 😏
Of course, you use that to justify your own conditioning.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
O.K. with me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by asromacalcio
Angels are androgynous. I can't answer for the Bible, but there are no he or she angels.
That is why the authors of the bible used male names. If there are male Angels, there must be female too. Maybe mankind has not encountered them yet.

We could say that they are created and not born, but even though the women here give birth, we are also created.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Male is just an aspect of divine energy and celestial beings can appear to humans as male or female, but Angels are androgynous unless they choose to be otherwise.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down


-Removed-
aha, so as I thought, you are not a troll.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I actually found this thread again. just fyi, I was not referring to you when I mentioned that I don't care to respond to those who are convinced. I have no problem giving you a response, but there are others that I choose not to engage with. It was a general statement that was not meant to be taken personally by you. I apologize if I gave that impression.
As you can see, I still have things to learn. Hopefully, I will always continue to learn.
Anyway, this thread has gone far from my original thought.
In the meantime, looking at the world conditions, it appears that the angels have their hands full holding the winds of destruction back.
What do you think?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
I disagree entirely.

.
No you don't!

You continued with
...Now I don't think that you should refuse a person a job based on beliefs they hold that don't have a significant bearing on the ability to do the job

😛

Which is what I meant (as you well know).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
So you [b]would put a JW in charge of your Super Bowl party?

I'll pass, then. So will everyone else.[/b]
Why on earth would I have a Super Bowl Party?