Anyone know for sure how old the earth is?

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Thought you'd be interested in this, Kelly

"1642
John Lightfoot (1602 – 1675)
Constructed a chronology from biblical genealogies and calculated that
the world was created at the equinox in September of 3298 BC.
http://www.christianity.co.nz/science5.htm

1650
James Ussher (1581 – 1656)
Calculated a creation day of Sunday 23 October 4004 BC. ...[text shortened]... me age, plus or minus 2%. Christianity can't even get 2 estimates within 10% of each other!

Multiple methods, can I get a list with the dates, say 20 with the
dates they come with?

Christianity as far as I know hasn't come up with any dates.
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
Multiple methods, can I get a list with the dates, say 20 with the
dates they come with?

Christianity as far as I know hasn't come up with any dates.
Kelly

I gave you the Zhang paper. Get to it.

I can email you a pdf if you like.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Knock yourself out.
Kelly

Come on, tackle the info we gave you. If you don't have a credible response we'll just accept you as a religious zealot, without and real credibility.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Multiple methods, can I get a list with the dates, say 20 with the
dates they come with?

Christianity as far as I know hasn't come up with any dates.
Kelly

You continue to be a very repetitive bad joke.

Originally posted by scottishinnz
I gave you the Zhang paper. Get to it.

I can email you a pdf if you like.

email it to me we can pass our address through the mail here.
Kelly

Originally posted by timebombted
You continue to be a very repetitive bad joke.

Well go laugh somewhere else, I don't care if you respond to my
posts or not.
Kelly

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Come on, tackle the info we gave you. If you don't have a credible response we'll just accept you as a religious zealot, without and real credibility.

I doubt anything I could say would change your mind about me since
we have been here so long already.
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
I doubt anything I could say would change your mind about me since
we have been here so long already.
Kelly

Try me.



Actually. for a first, try arguing the evidence.

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Try me.



Actually. for a first, try arguing the evidence.

Rots o ruck on that one.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Knock yourself out.
Kelly

Yes, good one considering you already knocked yourself out long ago.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Well go laugh somewhere else, I don't care if you respond to my
posts or not.
Kelly

Come on KJ everyone's curious how you will discredit these articles?

Or does your lack of acknowledgement to other posters research mean one of the following:

1. The evidence is overwhelming, you have no rebuttal so will continue to be obtuse and avoid the issue.
2. The evidence provided is beyond your intellectual understanding.
3. You fear to even read these articles because you know that they will make you question your precious faith, thus highlighting the time you have wasted throughout your life in false concepts.

1,2 or 3? Or here's a novel idea, address SNZ's evidence and comment constructively :0)

Originally posted by timebombted
Come on KJ everyone's curious how you will discredit these articles?

Or does your lack of acknowledgement to other posters research mean one of the following:

1. The evidence is overwhelming, you have no rebuttal so will continue to be obtuse and avoid the issue.
2. The evidence provided is beyond your intellectual understanding.
3. You fear to e ...[text shortened]... s.

1,2 or 3? Or here's a novel idea, address SNZ's evidence and comment constructively :0)

I just emailed him the pdf of that. Probably we should give him a little time to read it!

Originally posted by scottishinnz
I just emailed him the pdf of that. Probably we should give him a little time to read it!

Thanks :0)

Originally posted by timebombted
Come on KJ everyone's curious how you will discredit these articles?

Or does your lack of acknowledgement to other posters research mean one of the following:

1. The evidence is overwhelming, you have no rebuttal so will continue to be obtuse and avoid the issue.
2. The evidence provided is beyond your intellectual understanding.
3. You fear to e ...[text shortened]... s.

1,2 or 3? Or here's a novel idea, address SNZ's evidence and comment constructively :0)

Or # 4, he is ah, how you say, stringing us along, having a good laugh getting us to repeat ourselves for nothing, he might even be an atheist in disguise, playing devil's advocate. He could keep up the game forever till we figured out we have been punked.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Or # 4, he is ah, how you say, stringing us along, having a good laugh getting us to repeat ourselves for nothing, he might even be an atheist in disguise, playing devil's advocate. He could keep up the game forever till we figured out we have been punked.

I've started reading it, the worse you'll get is a delay when I come
back from our trip. Outside of that you'll get my views on the paper.
I'm already amazed at the events that are dated that are just said
as if they know for a fact they occured when.
Kelly