Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Are you effing serious?
Any good?
What a clueless, idiotic thing to say.
Atheists have little or no access to actual theology: they're far, far too lazy to seek it out and find out for themselves the science of it.
They're content in sitting on their asses, logging onto a website known more for its armchair experts than for scholarly examinations.
M ...[text shortened]... even have a few minutes of honest discussion on the topics, but you'll spend hours in ridicule?
That thread strikes me as one where the content was a personal project. I imagine it took you a considerable length of time to craft it, and furthermore, I'll wager that any theists who previewed it before us would have celebrated it for the depth of content.
You were probably hesitant about posting it, was your spelling correct? did you get all your Bible citations correct? was there anything important that you neglected to mention? Had you paid enough attention to your counter-rebuttals?
This was your masterpiece, we were going to enjoy it, we were going to be fascinated by it, it was so f''king awesome we atheists were going to converted in droves, it was just so damned good that the thread would never get old - we were meant to be still posting our responses to it today. This one thread would elevate your status to near god-hood yourself in this forum... and you wanted it to be perfect before putting it on the centre-stage.
Then you go and post it and it gets shot to $h!t!! ... by atheists!!! That must have hurt! Your many days (weeks?) of hard work dismissed, en-masse, by a bunch of "God-haters" whose responses were little more than a couple of paragraphs long. How dare we! How dare we not offer you the same amount of time in our critiques as you spent thinking about it and writing it. How dare we not acknowledge your brilliance!! How dare we belly-laugh!??? 😕
No wonder you dislike us atheists so much!
Well the thing is, for all it hurts Freaky you should have taken that as an opportunity to learn - but you haven't since 8 years later you still argue in precisely the same way. What you posted, which was pretty much a list of summaries of various statements that are written in the Bible, and/or definitions sourced from the same, rested upon the dubious assumption that your god exists, and that the Bible is an accurate account of this entity. If this isn't true (and I am certain it isn't) then it is no more meaningful than a treatise on elves, or a treatise on how 76 is the bestest damned number in the whole wide world because your grandma one said so. Almost all the rejections referred to this point, and unless I am mistaken you ignored every single one of them.