01 Aug '15 06:33>
Originally posted by RJHindsHumane rapists.
That could be used as evidence that the rapist that does not cut the tongues out and hands off is actually be humane.
Okay, now I've heard everything.
The post that was quoted here has been removedIt may be helpful for you to think less in absolute terms such as "hate" and go with the flow a little more. I would imagine that no one cares enough here to "hate" anyone else, and that most of realise that while certain posters irritate us, we probably irritate them also.
Originally posted by divegeesterYes, I concur. "Hate" is a rather harsh word for it. I think that "irritation" is probably the furthest most people get, but of course everyone's irritation threshold and limit is different.
It may be helpful for you to think less in absolute terms such as "hate" and go with the flow a little more. I would imagine that no one cares enough here to "hate" anyone else, and that most of realise that while certain posters irritate us, we probably irritate them also.
The post that was quoted here has been removedI doubt if anyone here on RHP even knows who you are. Certainly you are not using your real name. So how can they hate you?
The post that was quoted here has been removedThe Nazis had a concentration camp reserved for women. It was liberated by RKKA (Soviet Army). Three young Frenchwomen were among the prisoners liberated. Tragically, the period following their liberation was in some ways worse than their experiences under the Nazis. For several weeks, these Frenchwomen were raped many times every day and night by Soviet soldiers. A Frenchwoman would tell an approaching Soviet soldier: "I already have been through too much. I'm exhausted and cannot give you what you desire from me. Please leave me alone and don't hate me." And he would say, "I don't hate you! You are my pretty French sister. I love you! I have liberated you, and so you should be grateful to me. You should give yourself to me. Now I'm going to make love to you and then be on my way." And she would be raped again, while another soldier would be waiting to take his turn with her.Afterward, these Frenchwomen found it particularly hard to speak of having been raped not by their enemies, but by their supposed friends.
Originally posted by SuzianneThe point I was trying to make is that one is more humane than the other. I did not mean to imply that rapists are humane, but that some actions are more cruel than others. At least, I believe they are. Am I wrong in your opinion?
Humane rapists.
Okay, now I've heard everything.
Originally posted by FMFThe Soviet soldiers, being communist atheists, had the wrong belief about doing their duty to liberate these French women. They were not entitled to any thanks or anything else from the French women, because they were doing their duty for which they already received pay and benefits. They were not owed anything from the French women.
[b]The Nazis had a concentration camp reserved for women. It was liberated by RKKA (Soviet Army). Three young Frenchwomen were among the prisoners liberated. Tragically, the period following their liberation was in some ways worse than their experiences under the Nazis. For several weeks, these Frenchwomen were raped many times every day and night by Soviet so ...[text shortened]... tration camp survivors, which posters who argue with Suzianne on this forum do you have in mind?
Originally posted by SuzianneHas Duchess64's anecdote about a gang rape of a concentration camp survivor changed your mind about whether the word "hate" is appropriate when referring to the goings on in this community?
Yes, I concur. "Hate" is a rather harsh word for it. I think that "irritation" is probably the furthest most people get, but of course everyone's irritation threshold and limit is different.