@fmf saidNo.
Do Christians here believe that the philosophical stance or state [as it were] of 'not believing that Jesus physically rose from the dead' is literally a symptom and result of supernatural influence ~ or more specifically, Satanic influence?
Well, at least I don't.
I'm not gonna speak for anyone else. There's at least a non-negative chance that someone here might believe that.
@fmf saidIt's a hopelessly wrong question.
Do Christians here believe that the philosophical stance or state [as it were] of 'not believing that Jesus physically rose from the dead' is literally a symptom and result of supernatural influence ~ or more specifically, Satanic influence?
Of course, there are Satanic influences that affect people.
However, to say that disbelief is solely a result of Satanic influence denies the role of other factors in this.
There's a variety of factors. Satan, of course, can and often is one of them.
@philokalia saidI didn't use the word "solely". But I see what you did there.
However, to say that disbelief is solely a result of Satanic influence denies the role of other factors in this.
@philokalia saidSo it "is"? Just to be clear?
There's a variety of factors. Satan, of course, can and often is one of them.
Can someone not believe that Jesus physically rose from the dead and not be, in your view, any Satanic influence involved?
@fmf saidYa shoulda waffled a bit.
I didn't use the word "solely". But I see what you did there.
What can I say.
More words and more writing make the intention and the question clear.
@fmf saidOf course.
So it "is"? Just to be clear?
Can someone not believe that Jesus physically rose from the dead and not be, in your view, any Satanic influence involved?
The overwhelming majority of people in the world do not believe in the resurrection for very mundane reasons...
But let's say there was an argument that Satan encouraged the spread of Communism, and that Communism preventing Christianity from penetrating a person's society or family can be traced back to Communism... Well, that's an interesting argument. IDK. It's unproveable and entirely "out" in the theoretical land.
But I can see someone say something like that.
But this is an argument that would then be based on the interconnectivity of a great many events, all of which can be influenced by God and also by evil spirits... Your typical occasionalism.
I'll discuss what that means with an occasionalist, but even this is speculative if we are not relying on the words of the Saints, so IDK. Why not just content oneself with what is obvious in the world for now, and know that such an influence could be at work, but the overwhelming majority of people simply do not believe in Christ's resurrection because they are not Christians and have not had the occasion to be Christians or to learn of it.
@philokalia saidMy question is crystal clear largely due to its succinctness.
More words and more writing make the intention and the question clear.
@philokalia saidWhy would it be morally coherent for them to punished for eternity after they die?
The overwhelming majority of people in the world do not believe in the resurrection for very mundane reasons...
@philokalia saidOK, so far we have...
Of course.
Suzianne and Philokalia
...who do think that if someone does not believe that Jesus physically rose from the dead then that it is not necessarily due to Satanic influence.
@suzianne saidYou've read thousands of my posts so you know what I believe and what I don't believe.
No.
Well, at least I don't.
I'm not gonna speak for anyone else. There's at least a non-negative chance that someone here might believe that.
I do not believe that Jesus physically rose from the dead. In my case, of course, there is the added fact that I used to believe that He did.
Do you believe in a case like mine that me not believing that Jesus physically rose from the dead is the result of Satanic influence?
Philokalia, you can answer this too if you're inclined.
@philokalia saidWhat are they guilty of then?
the overwhelming majority of people simply do not believe in Christ's resurrection because they are not Christians and have not had the occasion to be Christians or to learn of it.
@philokalia saidBut let's say there was an argument that Satan encouraged the spread of Communism, and that Communism preventing Christianity from penetrating a person's society or family can be traced back to Communism... Well, that's an interesting argument. IDK. It's unproveable and entirely "out" in the theoretical land.
But I can see someone say something like that.
But this is an argument that would then be based on the interconnectivity of a great many events, all of which can be influenced by God and also by evil spirits... Your typical occasionalism.
I'll discuss what that means with an occasionalist, but even this is speculative if we are not relying on the words of the Saints, so IDK. Why not just content oneself with what is obvious in the world for now, and know that such an influence could be at work, but the overwhelming majority of people simply do not believe in Christ's resurrection because they are not Christians and have not had the occasion to be Christians or to learn of it.
I see what you did there.