Originally posted by sumydid
his narcissistic traits as derived from what is written about him in the bible.
-obvious self-focus in his affairs.
-he has problems sustaining satisfying relationships
-hypersensitivity to real or imagined insults.
-vulnerable to shame
-he's haughty and arrogant.
-his narcissistic supply is fed by loving and admiring people. he rewards (or promises ...[text shortened]... fore there couldn't possibly be a superior or more appropriate entity to focus His attention on.
thank you for confirming this point. it doesn't matter if there is no superior or more appropriate entity to focus attention on. personal glorification, deserved or not is a narcissistic trait.
There is no evidence to attest to the claim that God has problems with relationships.
the bible is a testament to biblgod's difficulties in maintaining a relationship with humans in general and in particular, his chosen.
God is not hypersensitive to insults. And obviously if He is God, no insults He would be aware of would be "imagined," i.e. nonexistent.
God is not vulnerable to shame and never demonstrated ever being even close to shamed.
zahlanzi adequately addressed these points. any being who is capable of being jealous is vulnerable to being shamed. biblegod makes no secret of his jealousy.
God is not arrogant - again, if indeed He is God, any focus on Himself or any credit He gives Himself is completely due.
the trait of arrogance is not dependent on credit being due.
God could not have any "narcissistic supply" if He is not a narcissist. This argument is circular because in your evidence, you presume Him to be narcissist as being proof of his narcissism.
god demands adoration; that's a narcissistic trait. his narcissistic supply comes from those who adore him. there is nothing circular about this argument.
God commits no "narcissistic abuse" -- this is once again circular. However, if He is God, then by all means He should detest anything or anyone that doesn't appreciate Him and reject Him.
becoming detested at those who don't adore him is a narcissistic trait. narcissistic abuse and narcissistic rage follows from this detestation. biblegod has demonstrated both narcissistic abuse and narcissistic rage in response to people's rejection or refusal to adore him.
Of course He "claims" to be imporant. If He is God, then nothing and no one could possibly be more important.
you are using circular reasoning here: he claims importance, he is god therefore he is important. claiming importance is a narcissistic trait. this trait does not hinge on the narcissist actually being important.
There's no bragging when it's fact. And by the way God spends precious little time talking about His accomplishments, except in His efforts to argue a point.
it is bragging even if it is a fact.
And again (sigh) - if He is God, then of course He is an expert in all things.
once again, claiming expertise in all things is a narcissistic trait.
You're argument is partially circular and entirely fallacious. On the one hand, you presume--if only to make a point--that God is God, but your entire argument against Him is valid if and only if God is *not* God.
There. Each fallacious, circular point was addressed. I hope you're satisfied, and I assume that at least partially, your goal was to waste my time.
you have failed to show a single flaw in my arguments. my arguments are not hinged at all on biblegod being god or not god. they are hinged solely on the description of biblegod's character and biblegod's actions that we have in the bible.
my goal was not to waste your time. it was to make a revelation. one revelation made is that you have a poor understanding of personality disorders. you should improve your knowledge in the field before continuing your attempts to explain away the points without understanding them.