18 Nov '12 07:35>3 edits
Originally posted by LemonJelloI didn't say bbarr fits any description. I asked him a question. It's a perfectly logical, hypothetical question based on the pronounced beliefs of an Atheist vs. a believer.
Bbarr does not fit either description with respect to your god. He claims to know that your god does not exist and he has evidence (for example by way of arguments) to show that he is right.
His claim that he has proof that God doesn't exist quite obviously doesn't come in to play, as one cannot verifiably prove a negative. He has no absolute proof. You know it, I know it, and the rest of the world knows it. So unless you are willing to depart from the real world and enter into a world where fantasies come true and the rules of basic logic don't exist... bbarr has not proven a negative. So we move past that assumably tongue-in-cheek claim, and get back to reality....
Now if you'll excuse me, I asked bbarr a question...............