Go back
Bloodless surgery wanted by the army......

Bloodless surgery wanted by the army......

Spirituality


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Gman please ignore them. Dont feed trolls. Honestly kick them into touch they have nothing of any value to offer anyone. Have nothing to do with them.
Oh yeah..I see nothing has changed here especially with these two spiritually void sons of Satan.
But I'll check in from time to time to see if there just might happen to be a good sound discussion on the bible with good questions and good answers being produced that are up building in nature as these two have pretty much killed that for everyone.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
because its irrelevant, haven't I told you that already?
Well then we go back to the other question of mine you avoided. How can asking a JW a question about JW literature in a thread started by a JW about a YouTube video made by JW be termed irrelevant? The topic is blood transfusions and bloodless surgery, I asked you to comment on a particular quote form your own organisations literature about blood transfusions and the reasons for bloodless surgery and you deem my question irrelevant. Are you using a non standard definition for the word 'irrelevant'? Because I don't see how my question could be more relevant to the discussion at hand.

1 edit

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Well then we go back to the other question of mine you avoided. How can asking a JW a question about JW literature in a thread started by a JW about a YouTube video made by JW be termed irrelevant? The topic is blood transfusions and bloodless surgery, I asked you to comment on a particular quote form your own organisations literature about blood transfu ...[text shortened]... relevant'? Because I don't see how my question could be more relevant to the discussion at hand.
No the topic is bloodless surgery and alternatives to blood transfusions. The only reason that Jehovahs Witnesses were mentioned is because we helped pioneer the technology. If you wish to discuss the technology or case studies associated with the use of the technology then please do so. The topic has never been Jehovahs Witnesses stance on blood.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Hey sup satanjeester, managed to get any Christians to offer up incense to an effigy of the Emperor recently?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Oh yeah..I see nothing has changed here especially with these two spiritually void sons of Satan.
But I'll check in from time to time to see if there just might happen to be a good sound discussion on the bible with good questions and good answers being produced that are up building in nature as these two have pretty much killed that for everyone.
Yes Satanjeester and FMF the apostate, same old drivel day in day out. Its almost impossible to get them to stick to the topic. Yes they attempt to kill every thread they enter by fabricating values about people. I am fed up calling them out about it, it makes no difference. Let the dead bury their dead. 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No the topic is bloodless surgery and alternatives to blood transfusions. The only reason that Jehovahs Witnesses were mentioned is because we helped pioneer the technology. If you wish to discuss the technology or case studies associated with the use of the technology then please do so. The topic has never been Jehovahs Witnesses stance on blood.
Curious, galveston75 made reference to the 'dangers of blood transfusions' himself earlier in the thread. Did you miss that bit?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Curious, galveston75 made reference to the 'dangers of blood transfusions' himself earlier in the thread. Did you miss that bit?
No its one of the reasons that bloodless surgery was developed.


3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

What me and my family do is none of your business. We certainly wont be taking any advice from a son of Satan like you. They are free moral agents with the right of self determination and can decide for themselves what they will do with their own bodies. I will certainly be advocating bloodless surgery to anyone I know that's for sure, Whether they are members of my family or not. Whether they are Jehovahs Witnesses or not.

1 edit

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
back of the net

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Captain Strange
back of the net
yeah his own net. 😀

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
You asked me about my family i told you. They are free moral agents with recourse to the faculty of conscience and the right of self determination, what other people do is their affair they are also free moral agents. Bue Roberts by his own admission was disfellowshiped for lack of repentance not for taking blood, pity that for you. There are of course also on the information provided by myself and Galveston countless cases where person have successfully undergone bloodless surgery, some little children some every old people. There is a doctor who states that he has niot lost a single patient during bloodless surgery. I suspect that its a great pity for you that they did not die depriving you of something to hate. You cannot handle the fact that scientific advancement has vindicated out stance on blood and its now the gold standard of medical treatment being adopted by the US military and various hospitals around the world. Meh h8ters like you always gonna h8.

Disfellowshipping is a Biblically established practice, so is abstaining from blood, we shall not be abandoning any Bible principles because a son of Satan like you doesn't like the fact, you might have a weak and watery faith based on personal preference and convenience but ours is solidly rooted in the Bible.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down