born again christian

Originally posted by FMF
Saying it is "neither here nor there" doesn't add up, robbie. Do you believe that the Bible condemns that stuff being portrayed in films?

what is it about, 'the Bible condemns.....' that you dont understand?

Originally posted by FMF
No. Did you not understand my question? Or are you trying to sidestep it?

all reasons are valid, it is you who have sought to attempt to elevate one over another,
you see to it, its your assertion that one 'trumps', another , not mine.

Originally posted by FMF
I have "fabricated" something? But you said the Bible condemned it. So the Bible condemns it but you don't?

Its not about me.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what is it about, 'the Bible condemns.....' that you dont understand?

So the Bible condemns fictional portrayal of real life situations like the ones I mentioned? Where does it say that?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its not about me.

Well it's about things you say not adding up. We are in a discussion are we not? You say I "fabricated" something. But I don't think I have. I seem to have found an inconsistency in what you are claiming. You said the Bible condemned it. But you also said you don't personally condemn it. Why the 'gap' between you and the Bible you're quoting in this particular instance?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
all reasons are valid, it is you who have sought to attempt to elevate one over another,
you see to it, its your assertion that one 'trumps', another , not mine.

You don't think that 'God condemns it' is a reason that you would elevate above a reason like 'the film is not to my taste'?

-Removed-

I am saying that its up to an individual conscience, will i get a stamp made up and have
it stamped on your forehead, I will not say it again, this is the third time, already and
my words reverberate against the side of your head and dissipate into nothingness.

Originally posted by FMF
You don't think that 'God condemns it' is a reason that you would elevate above a reason like 'the film is not to my taste'?

both are valid reasons for not viewing a piece of entertainment.

Originally posted by FMF
Well it's about things you say not adding up. We are in a discussion are we not? You say I "fabricated" something. But I don't think I have. I seem to have found an inconsistency in what you are claiming. You said the Bible condemned it. But you also said you don't personally condemn it. Why the 'gap' between you and the Bible you're quoting in this particular instance?

its not about me, all further references to me personally, will be ignored. You attempt
the same thing time and again, Jaywill got fed up of it concluding that you had nothing
of value to say and I am asking you now, for the countless time, STOP reducing every
single thread to some kind of personal level. ITS NOT ABOUT ME!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
both are valid reasons for not viewing a piece of entertainment.

But you would not elevate a reason like 'God condemns it' above a reason like 'the film is not to my taste', is that it?

Originally posted by FMF
So the Bible condemns fictional portrayal of real life situations like the ones I mentioned? Where does it say that?

(1 Timothy 4:7) . . .But turn down the false stories which violate what is holy and which
old women tell. . .

to what kind of stories was Paul referring, if you know anything about it?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ITS NOT ABOUT ME!

It's about what you have said to me, about yourself, in this discussion. You said that the Bible condemned it. But you also said that you don't personally condemn it. This clear inconsistency strikes me as being absolutely fundamental. Can you explain it?

-Removed-

I am not angry, if you answer a question three times and still the point is asked again
and again, clearly something is wrong, either someone is at the madam, or I am
speaking a foreign language.