Originally posted by stellspalfie is this your way of telling us that you are doing a parody of being a christian?
It should be clear to any reasonable thinking person that these videos refute the religion of atheism that requires no thinking. However, atheists are not reasonable thinking people. So, sometimes it is necessary to use parody to get through to atheists, who are too lazy to think for themselves. 😏
Originally posted by RJHinds It should be clear to any reasonable thinking person that these videos refute the religion of atheism that requires no thinking. However, atheists are not reasonable thinking people. So, sometimes it is necessary to use parody to get through to atheists, who are too lazy to think for themselves. 😏
just give me a wink or a nod if your dumb, redneck, christian persona is fake. quick while nobody else is looking.
Originally posted by RJHinds It should be clear to any reasonable thinking person that these videos refute the religion of atheism that requires no thinking. However, atheists are not reasonable thinking people. So, sometimes it is necessary to use parody to get through to atheists, who are too lazy to think for themselves. 😏
You are running out of ideas
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Edward_Current
I could tolerate your boring stupid parody of being some kind of right-wing pseudo christian nut-job if you weren't a cheat at chess.
[b]Please edit quoted text responsibly. Making modifications which misrepresent the original post will result in a forum ban.[/b]
How odd. You've been here 2 years and yet you've seemingly not come across the forum convention of making a change and then posting the message "Fixed" in order to make a point about the previous poster's message? There is no misrepresentation if the word "Fixed" draws our attention to the fact that the original post has been changed.
Originally posted by FMF How odd. You've been here 2 years and yet you've seemingly not come across the forum convention of making a change and then posting the message "Fixed" in order to make a point about the previous poster's message? There is no misrepresentation if the word "Fixed" draws our attention to the fact that the original post has been changed.
My original post said the following:
I am a lying, cheating, obnoxious, redneck, Christian. That's the best kind. That's because I really need Christ as a Savior. No doubt about it.
Then divegeester replied to my post with Fixed after editing it so that it looked like this:
Originally posted by RJHinds
I am a lying, cheating, obnoxious and boring troll pretending to be a Chrisitan
So you see the above post that he fixed is a misrepresentation of what I originally said.
If he wanted to disagree with it, he could have done it in his text and leaving my text as it was and still adding the word "Fixed" at the end.
Calling All Atheists
27 Jan '13 16:271 edit
YouTube
Back to Top