29 Jan '13 00:08>
Originally posted by sonhouseNo, I didn't. As soon as I read the name Edward Current I went somewhere else.
Did you get the part where he called the pillar of salt lady the 'pillow' of salt? That was a big clue.
Originally posted by divegeesterI don't know. Sorry.
Do you think RHinds is posting this as a parody as part of a fake christian identity, or do you think he really believes Edward Current to be "refuting atheism"?
Originally posted by divegeesterHe reveals the atheistic thoughts in his parody, thus making a fool of himself, duh. This man demonstrated the proof of the truth of Holy scipture that is written - the fool has said in his heart there is no God. Duh!
Ah, so you realised Edward Current was parodying Christianity's view of atheism before you made the OPs?
Originally posted by RJHindsDid you realised Edward Current was parodying Christianity's view of atheism before you made the OP?
He reveals the atheistic thoughts in his parody, thus making a fool of himself, duh. This man demonstrated the proof of the truth of Holy scipture that is written - the fool has said in his heart there is no God.
Originally posted by PenguinThanks for introducing me to Poe's law. The truth of the matter is undeniable, it's good to see itso well defined
Do you reckon RJ has actually seen that first video? Or is this an example of Poe's Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law) in action?
Or is the 'RJ' character the parody, as has been suggested several times? I am finding harder and harder to believe that RJ can really be that mind-numbingly stupid.
RJ, own up. Do you really honestly think that first link is an attempt to refute atheism?
--- Penguin
Originally posted by FMFAnd this from a man who knows duckspeak when he uses... I mean hears it, yeah, that's what I meant.
"Blasphemy" is a kind of thoughtcrime and the suggestion that it applies to non-believers requires doublethink but, in my experience, pointing this out often provokes duckspeak.
Originally posted by johnnylongwoodyThose who blaspheme against God are still sinning against God, even if they do not believe in God or sin, and you will be called upon at Judgement to defend your decision to do so.
How can you blaspheme if you don't believe in that which is
supposed to have been blasphemed against?
Salman Rushdie is alleged to have blasphemed when he wrote the Satanic Verses.
The cartoon that appeared in a Danish newspaper poking fun at
the prophet Mohammed is also alleged to be guilty of blasphemy.
But supposing someone believed ...[text shortened]... f blasphemy?
No one can prove the supernatural exists, so how could you blaspheme about it?