2 edits
@divegeester
How come when you are asked a question in the same style as you interrogate others its usually - "Start a New Thread, and I PROMISE This or That" ?
ie. Move the goal post and make a new promise.
Its getting quite old.
Here you go. No need for NEW THREAD !
Divegeester, do you think that human language can perfectly describe God ?
Yes or No?
No need for "Start a NEW THREAD and I promise, I promise, I promise .... etc."
-Removed-Question ASKED 1rst time here:
Divegeester, do you think that human language can perfectly describe God ?
Yes or No?
If Yes - would you do so please for us?
If No - do you mind if some of us TRY, knowing that human language has its limitations. Our explanation of His nature will not be as perfect as God Himself is.
1. NO ANSWER HERE
You mock and yet you won't tell me.
Maybe I missed it.
2. NO ANSWER HERE EITHER
I guess you will never choose to reply.
I wonder why...
3. NO ANSWER HERE EITHER
Them, when we see "THEM" we all will know.
There THREE remember.
Well he's talking to SecondSon and KellyJay.
Ask Question again
DIvegeester, I'm shocked. You mean given a perfectly binary choice you are not going to CHOOSE Yes or No?
I thought you were the simplicity guy - break it down to either Yes or No.
How come its OK for you to be strict to hold other people to a choice but you hedge when its put to YOU?
I don't understand.
4. Does He answer here ??
Saying you answered when you didn’t is dishonest SecondSon.
PS have you read up on conflating metaphors with literalisms.
Nope. But he's talking to someone else.
5. What about HERE ??
Are you going to answer my question or just keep up slightly revolting mutual stroking session with SecondSon?
6. No answer there either.
What about his next post ?
It’s your silly belief sonship, not mine.
Are the 3 distinct personalities of your version of the Godhead co-equal. Yes or no?
7. NOPE.
What about his next post ??
No.
There you go. See it’s quite easy when you are not scared of your pet beliefs being exposed as the errors they are.
OKAY. At last.
Divegeester said NO. Thankyou. I missed it.
Human language according to Divegeester CANNOT (NO) perfectly explain God.
So then don't OVERESTIMATE your challenges to insist words Christians may use to describe God have some problems with their usage. You're not doing anything spectacular to point out the problems. So it could be problematic to use "distinct personalities" to attempt to speak of God's mysterious nature. We know that.
Are the 3 distinct personalities of your version of the Godhead co-equal.
Yes or no?
The phrase "three distinct personalities" has its limits, is not perfect, is not above being able to object to on SOME level.
Human language really cannot perfectly describe God - So admits Divegeester.
