1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieI don't know because I am not a geneticist, but Dr John Sanford is a geneticist and co-inventor of the "gene gun" used for shooting DNA into cells. He now states he believes in a young creation and that Darwinian evolution is impossible.
do you think your genes can be traced in your children?
Dr Sanford said, "I am not aware of any type of operational science (computer science, transportation, medicine, agriculture, engineering, etc.), which has benefited from evolutionary theory. But after the fact, real advances in science are systematically given an evolutionary spin. This reflects the pervasive politicization of science."
http://creation.com/geneticist-evolution-impossible
The Instructor
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by RJHindsyour also not a physicist or a geologist. so why are you happy to speculate on those subjects but not if your own children share some of your genes???
I don't know because I am not a geneticist, but Dr John Sanford is a geneticist and co-inventor of the "gene gun" used for shooting DNA into cells. He now states he believes in a young creation and that Darwinian evolution is impossible.
[b]Dr Sanford said, "I am not aware of any type of operational science (computer science, transportation, medicine, ag ...[text shortened]... of science."
http://creation.com/geneticist-evolution-impossible
The Instructor[/b]
Originally posted by stellspalfieI do not choose to speculate on every subject under the sun. I would rather refer to someone who has studied the subject more than I.
your also not a physicist or a geologist. so why are you happy to speculate on those subjects but not if your own children share some of your genes???
The Instructor
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by RJHindsif you have such little knowledge of your own, to the point where you do not even know if science can traces genes, how do you know who to believe when it comes to referring to others?
I do not choose to speculate on every subject under the sun. I would rather refer to someone who has studied the subject more than I.
The Instructor
Originally posted by stellspalfieHe refuses to acknowledge any tiny hint of evolution being possible so puts his thumbs in his ear, not even admitting his genes could be shared in his children. Disgusting is what it is.
if you have such little knowledge of your own, to the point where you do not even know if science can traces genes, how do you know who to believe when it comes to referring to others?
2 edits
Originally posted by stellspalfieYou are assuming I have little knowledge on my own. I gain much knowledge by tapping into other people's knowledge as well as knowledge from the Holy Bible. I use that knowledge along with the intelligent use of logic and reason to know who to refer to others.
if you have such little knowledge of your own, to the point where you do not even know if science can traces genes, how do you know who to believe when it comes to referring to others?
The Instructor
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsYour so-called knowledge comes from so-called scientists who come into a study with a built in agenda, to disprove evolution and force creationism to be taught in science classes. That is not knowledge that is twisted persuasion for political purposes.
You are assuming I have little knowledge on my own. I gain much knowledge by tapping into other people's knowledge as well as knowledge from the Holy Bible. I use that knowledge along with the intelligent use of logic and reason to know who to refer to others.
The Instructor
And you bloody well know it.
Originally posted by sonhouseThis is what honest scientist say:
Your so-called knowledge comes from so-called scientists who come into a study with a built in agenda, to disprove evolution and force creationism to be taught in science classes. That is not knowledge that is twisted persuasion for political purposes.
And you bloody well know it.
The Theory of Evolution is wrong (part1)
The Theory of Evolution is wrong (part2)
Did you notice the difference between what the honest scientist say and the dishonest scientists and that the dishonest scientists were caught lying about evilution evidence?
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsSorry, but video's are not science. Science is daring to submit your work to peer review, something that just doesn't happen with these so- called scientists, it doesn't matter HOW MANY Phd's they have between them, they are in in with an agenda. HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU, going into it with an agenda AUTOMATICALLY means you bend the data to suit the ax you have to grind. You go into it with a built in agenda and twist, bend, break, anything you can do to avoid the truth in the mad quest for their agenda, which is DUH to destroy an entire science. Several sciences, actually, like geology, can't have the world being 4 billion years old, can we? Doesn't fit our built in agenda. Can't have evolution, goes against that antiquated book you call the bible. As if THAT were some kind of real reference. Good luck convincing real people about all the fairy tales there. Why do you think Christianity is on the wane in the US? BECAUSE OF PEOPLE JUST LIKE YOU WHO THINK EVERYONE IS SO STUPID THEY HAVE TO BE TAUGHT.
This is what honest scientist say:
The Theory of Evolution is wrong (part1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWDRz5cSziQ
The Theory of Evolution is wrong (part2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4ylfLqiyRo
Did you notice the difference between what the honest scientist say and the dishonest scientists and that the dishonest scientists were caught lying about evilution evidence?
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseI DON'T THINK YOU ARE STUPID, JUST STUBBORN.
Sorry, but video's are not science. Science is daring to submit your work to peer review, something that just doesn't happen with these so- called scientists, it doesn't matter HOW MANY Phd's they have between them, they are in in with an agenda. HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU, going into it with an agenda AUTOMATICALLY means you bend the data to sui ...[text shortened]... ? BECAUSE OF PEOPLE JUST LIKE YOU WHO THINK EVERYONE IS SO STUPID THEY HAVE TO BE TAUGHT.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsFortunately science is not done by the likes of you, it is done by people without a built in agenda to prove some point or other but who want to know the truth of the matter.
I DON'T THINK YOU ARE STUPID, JUST STUBBORN.
The Instructor
That is exactly why you are on the fringe of society. You cannot see the trees for the forest. You are blind to reality, blinded by your blind faith in that intelligently designed religion, you know, the one you believe in, designed intelligently by human beings with no input needed from a god since all they are saying is bullshyte. A real god would not intimate the world is 6000 years old, it would go, what in the HELL are you doing, you asssholes? The world is 14 BILLION years old and don't even TRY to change that fact.
Originally posted by sonhouseWhat good does it do me to believe as you do? I don't see any benefit.
Fortunately science is not done by the likes of you, it is done by people without a built in agenda to prove some point or other but who want to know the truth of the matter.
That is exactly why you are on the fringe of society. You cannot see the trees for the forest. You are blind to reality, blinded by your blind faith in that intelligently designed ...[text shortened]... doing, you asssholes? The world is 14 BILLION years old and don't even TRY to change that fact.
The Instructor