Celebration of Creation - Ben Carson, MD

Originally posted by RJHinds
Do you really think i give a rat's ass?

No, you seem very happy wallowing in your feculent ignorance.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Medicine and religion are his strong points. Yes, even though he's a Seventh-day Adventist. Yes, even though he does not believe in evolution as a tool of creation. His parents were SDA, and so far he hasn't been able to overcome that. And he's a brilliant surgeon.

Politics is not. He should stay with what he knows and keep his extremist political views to himself.

Joe Biden, George Bush, and Nancy Pelosi are all proof you can be an idiot and be a politician.

The problem with Ben is, he is not an empty suit who has sold his soul to the powers that be. That disqualified him from office.

Originally posted by KellyJay
I think everyone should be able to express their views, labels as extremist are just some
body else' opinion, which could be the extreme view, so they all should be able to air them.

Those on the left are adamant about separation of church and state,,.................unless::

1. Hillary is talking about changing religious views on abortion

2. Obama is trying to convince Christians that they should be giving more to the government to help the poor.

3. Men like "Reverend" Sharpton gets up to preach in a church.

4. Obama lectures Christians about the Crusades showing they are no better than Muslims in jihad around the world today.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Freedom of speech isn't that important to you and your country I take it?

Sigh...

The easy rebuttal is that freedom of speech is 'too' important in yours. (I'm guessing you're American, apologies if you're not).

Yes, freedom of speech is an important human right, but it doesn't supersede all others. (Trust me, it doesn't). Take for example the chap who stands up during a tennis match and starts shouting obscenities. Does his (extreme) right of freedom of speech outweigh the right of everyone else to enjoy the tennis? Of course it doesn't. He will rightly be removed by security as tennis clubs, like civilized society as a whole, has rules to protect the many from the extreme few. Rights come with responsibilities sir. We have freedom of speech but a responsibility to know when keeping quiet is the right thing to do.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Sigh...

The easy rebuttal is that freedom of speech is 'too' important in yours. (I'm guessing you're American, apologies if you're not).

Yes, freedom of speech is an important human right, but it doesn't supersede all others. (Trust me, it doesn't). Take for example the chap who stands up during a tennis match and starts shouting obscenities. ...[text shortened]... have freedom of speech but a responsibility to know when keeping quiet is the right thing to do.

I'm sorry you are sighing?
I make a point about people's point of view and you responded how, and you sigh?

I get that not everything anyone wants to say isn't something we want to allow, shouting
fire in movie not free speech if not true.

Originally posted by whodey
Joe Biden, George Bush, and Nancy Pelosi are all proof you can be an idiot and be a politician.

The problem with Ben is, he is not an empty suit who has sold his soul to the powers that be. That disqualified him from office.

Another problem is that he is Black and everyone knows that the Republican party is racist. 😏

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Sigh...

The easy rebuttal is that freedom of speech is 'too' important in yours. (I'm guessing you're American, apologies if you're not).

Yes, freedom of speech is an important human right, but it doesn't supersede all others. (Trust me, it doesn't). Take for example the chap who stands up during a tennis match and starts shouting obscenities. ...[text shortened]... have freedom of speech but a responsibility to know when keeping quiet is the right thing to do.

You seem to enjoy acting like a British fool. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Another problem is that he is Black and everyone knows that the Republican party is racist. 😏

It appears that maybe blacks in Baltimore, like Ben Carson, are really white African Americans.

It would explain why a city with black policemen and a black mayor under a black President, could all be in cahoots to keep the black folk down

Originally posted by whodey
It appears that maybe blacks in Baltimore, like Ben Carson, are really white African Americans.

It would explain why a city with black policemen and a black mayor under a black President, could all be in cahoots to keep the black folk down

How many human races are there?

Originally posted by KellyJay
How many human races are there?

1. Caucasian races (Aryans, Hamites, Semites)

2. Mongolian races (northern Mongolian, Chinese and Indo-Chinese, Japanese and Korean, Tibetan, Malayan, Polynesian, Maori, Micronesian, Eskimo, American Indian)

3. Negroid races (African, Hottentots, Melanesians/Papua, “Negrito”, Australian Aborigine, Dravidians, Sinhalese)

http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/how-many-major-races-are-there-in-the-world/

According the the Holy Bible the races came from the three sons of Noah.
JAPHETH, HAM, and SHEM

Originally posted by RJHinds
You seem to enjoy acting like a British fool. 😏

But at least sir i am only acting the fool.

😞

Originally posted by KellyJay
I'm sorry you are sighing?
I make a point about people's point of view and you responded how, and you sigh?

I get that not everything anyone wants to say isn't something we want to allow, shouting
fire in movie not free speech if not true.

You asked me directly if i didn't value freedom of speech, a challenge that i find rather tiresome. (Hence the sigh).

I'm glad though that you recognise freedom of speech comes with restrictions.

Originally posted by RJHinds
[b]DNA – Proof of Noah’s Flood

Genetic evidence for the Flood - a human population bottleneck matching Noah's Flood (Genesis 6-9) - is glaringly obvious when our DNA is examined truthfully and logically. You will learn how mutations in both Y Chromosomes and Mitochondria DNA can definitely point to the 4 men and 4 women that were on the Ark, around 4,500 years ago.[/b]

That's not right. I won't bother with asking for a source, because you'll probably just link to some bs creationist website, that in turn won't give credible sources.

The genetic evidence suggest that there's been a few bottlenecks in human populations over the last 70000 years or so, but never has the population gone down to only a handful individuals. The worst bottleneck would have left at least a thousand individuals standing. Wishful thinking can't remove the fact of inbreeding depression occurring when you try to repopulate a species from only a few individuals.

Nature - Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences:

http://tinyurl.com/nu57j6z

Originally posted by RJHinds
1. [b]Caucasian races (Aryans, Hamites, Semites)

2. Mongolian races (northern Mongolian, Chinese and Indo-Chinese, Japanese and Korean, Tibetan, Malayan, Polynesian, Maori, Micronesian, Eskimo, American Indian)

3. Negroid races (African, Hottentots, Melanesians/Papua, “Negrito”, Australian Aborigine, Dravidians, Sinhalese)

http://b ...[text shortened]... According the the Holy Bible the races came from the three sons of Noah.
JAPHETH, HAM, and SHEM[/b]

My answer there is only one.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
You asked me directly if i didn't value freedom of speech, a challenge that i find rather tiresome. (Hence the sigh).

I'm glad though that you recognise freedom of speech comes with restrictions.

A challenge you found tiresome, what of your reply to what I wrote? If you insult someone
else' post what did you think would happen?