Originally posted by RJHindsWhich is as I said, we are one people we all came through Noah and before that Adam.
1. [b]Caucasian races (Aryans, Hamites, Semites)
2. Mongolian races (northern Mongolian, Chinese and Indo-Chinese, Japanese and Korean, Tibetan, Malayan, Polynesian, Maori, Micronesian, Eskimo, American Indian)
3. Negroid races (African, Hottentots, Melanesians/Papua, “Negrito”, Australian Aborigine, Dravidians, Sinhalese)
http://b ...[text shortened]... According the the Holy Bible the races came from the three sons of Noah.
JAPHETH, HAM, and SHEM[/b]
To separate people into making them something other than one people would be what
you argue against all the time evolution.
Originally posted by whodeyThis just highlights the issues man has, we really do like cutting off one part of our race
The two races are white conservative racists and Progs.
According to the press, those are the two races.
from ourselves for some reason or another, be it skin color, political ideology, religious
views, or some other reason. It should also be a warning that when we do that we run
the risk of not treating each other fairly, or at least the way we would like to be treated.
Originally posted by KellyJayIt's one thing to express views, it's quite another to be acting on those views to garner political power to force creationism to be taught in a science class AS IF IT WERE AN ACTUAL SCIENCE. It is no such thing and never will be. THAT is the problem with the expression of those views.
I think everyone should be able to express their views, labels as extremist are just some
body else' opinion, which could be the extreme view, so they all should be able to air them.
Originally posted by sonhouseThere is nothing from Dr. Ben Carson about forcing creationism tp be taught in science class. You are just rumor-mongering.
It's one thing to express views, it's quite another to be acting on those views to garner political power to force creationism to be taught in a science class AS IF IT WERE AN ACTUAL SCIENCE. It is no such thing and never will be. THAT is the problem with the expression of those views.
Originally posted by sonhouseI guess you need or want the thought police out there making sure everyone has their
It's one thing to express views, it's quite another to be acting on those views to garner political power to force creationism to be taught in a science class AS IF IT WERE AN ACTUAL SCIENCE. It is no such thing and never will be. THAT is the problem with the expression of those views.
minds right than uh!? If a view that does line up with what you think is 'real science' could
be so dangerous, science must be very fragile that it cannot handle an expression of
views that are faith based. Sort of funny when I think about it, since so much of what you
believe is faith based, you just wrap it up and call it science to justify it and differentiate
it from religion in your mind.
Originally posted by sonhouseDid you watch the talk to see what it was he actually said, or are you just worried that
It's one thing to express views, it's quite another to be acting on those views to garner political power to force creationism to be taught in a science class AS IF IT WERE AN ACTUAL SCIENCE. It is no such thing and never will be. THAT is the problem with the expression of those views.
a doctor could have a view about science that is different than yours, you automatically
started fear mongering?
1 edit
Originally posted by KellyJayIf you don't think what I said is true, you are naive. The ultimate goal is to destroy evolution as a science and force creationism to be taught to young minds in order to brainwash them into your religion. Thus keeping the scourge of religion alive for yet another generation.
Did you watch the talk to see what it was he actually said, or are you just worried that
a doctor could have a view about science that is different than yours, you automatically
started fear mongering?
It is very good the courts see through the subterfuge and reject all that creationistic bullshyte.
Originally posted by sonhouseCreation being taught in school would be much better than Evilution being taught in school. 😏
If you don't think what I said is true, you are naive. The ultimate goal is to destroy evolution as a science and force creationism to be taught to young minds in order to brainwash them into your religion. Thus keeping the scourge of religion alive for yet another generation.
It is very good the courts see through the subterfuge and reject all that creationistic bullshyte.
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseLOL, so it wasn't brought up but you threw it in anyway?
If you don't think what I said is true, you are naive. The ultimate goal is to destroy evolution as a science and force creationism to be taught to young minds in order to brainwash them into your religion. Thus keeping the scourge of religion alive for yet another generation.
It is very good the courts see through the subterfuge and reject all that creationistic bullshyte.