1. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    13 May '12 14:23
    Originally posted by boonon
    Hi,

    I would say by design.

    I have been doing a little research lately on mathematical probabilities.

    I am neither a mathematician nor a scientist so the numbers and concepts are a little hard for me to follow.

    From what I have been studying the probability of a living cell to form by itself is next to zero.

    I know that you are talking about stars and galaxies but I think they fit together with your question (chance/design).
    Ok here is the thing.

    If you were to take some complex arrangement of atoms in a molecule (like say DNA) and ask what are the
    odds of a bunch of atoms randomly forming themselves into that pattern then you will get a probability of
    1 in some stupidly large number.


    However that is not how molecules (or DNA) forms.

    Atoms don't just come together randomly.


    If you take a mixture of atoms of different elements, stick them in a container, and add energy (heat) then they
    will start to organise themselves.

    As the atoms move around they will collide with and bond to other elements to form molecules.

    Different types of atoms (elements) bond to other atoms more strongly than others and some pairings of elements
    don't work as the atoms really don't like to bond with each other.

    For example many elements bond strongly to oxygen.

    And some elements don't like bonding at all.

    So while these initially free atoms might start out by bonding to the first thing they hit, as they continue to whiz around
    they will continue to have collisions and weak bonds will likely break and strong ones survive, so the elements will form
    predictable molecules based on the elements that like to bond to each other.

    Different levels of energy (heat/light/electricity) in different environments with different combinations of starter elements
    will result in different types of molecules being formed.

    Some chemical reactions happen preferentially on certain 'catalysts' which make those reactions easier and more likely.

    Some molecules that form act as catalysts that make subsequent reactions more likely.


    And some molecules actually actively build copies of themselves, they self replicate (in the right environment).


    Now the formation of a successful self replicating molecule requires a fairly long string of events to happen in the right order.

    However in the conditions likely to exist on the early earth there were the relevant chemicals coming together in trillions
    of different ways every second over the entire planets surface for tens of millions of years.

    And the earth is almost certainly only one of millions if not billions of potential locations life could form in in the universe.


    So the question of the probability of life forming is thus not like the question of how likely are you to win the lottery.

    But more like the question of how likely is it that someone will win the lottery.


    The odds of someone winning the lottery are pretty good, which is why it happens most weeks.


    Unlikely events are in fact not just likely to happen, they are inevitable.

    This is the problem conspiracy theorists have.

    They look at events like 9:11 and scrutinise the events of the day in huge detail and they spot coincidences and unexplained
    and possibly inexplicable unlikely events and coincidences and then because they think that because those events and coincidences
    are unlikely that they couldn't have happened by chance they see it as evidence of a conspiracy.

    It's not. Unlikely events and coincidences happen all the time.
  2. Joined
    30 Dec '04
    Moves
    94500
    13 May '12 14:54
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Ok here is the thing.

    If you were to take some complex arrangement of atoms in a molecule (like say DNA) and ask what are the
    odds of a bunch of atoms randomly forming themselves into that pattern then you will get a probability of
    1 in some stupidly large number.


    However that is not how molecules (or DNA) forms.

    Atoms don't just come toge ...[text shortened]... ence of a conspiracy.

    It's not. Unlikely events and coincidences happen all the time.
    wow,

    That is a lot to take in so I will re-read it again. Thanks

    How did atoms form?

    I just heard someone say the other day that atoms naturally want to 'divide' (Something like putting two north ends of a magnet together). They said that not only can man not figure out what holds them together (keeps them from dividing like they want to), but man himself can only split two 'unstable atoms'.

    Is any of that true?

    Thanks
  3. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    13 May '12 15:164 edits
    Originally posted by boonon
    wow,

    That is a lot to take in so I will re-read it again. Thanks

    How did atoms form?

    I just heard someone say the other day that atoms naturally want to 'divide' (Something like putting two north ends of a magnet together). They said that not only can man not figure out what holds them together (keeps them from dividing like they want to), but man himself can only split two 'unstable atoms'.

    Is any of that true?

    Thanks
    How did atoms form?


    This would, of course, be changing the topic of conversation for he didn't say anything about how atoms themselves form but rather he spoke of how atoms form into molecules i.e. two or more atoms combine together to form molecules.

    But if you want to know how atoms formed; mainly hydrogen was made in the big bang but other heavier types of atoms were made as a result of nuclear fusion in stars that turns lighter elements ( starting with hydrogen ) into heavier elements that then escape from exploding stars to then form nebulae, planets, etc and even form yet more stars.
  4. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    13 May '12 15:24
    Originally posted by boonon
    Hi,

    Thank you for the links, I will check them out.

    I noticed you used the word 'inevitable' twice.

    I'm not sure that I agree with what you are putting forth as 'inevitable', that is a very strong word to use.


    I was listening to a Mathematician the other day and they said that it is generally accepted that anything with a probability of more t ...[text shortened]... s true?

    I only pose this to you because you seem versed in math and science.

    Thanks..
    I was listening to a Mathematician the other day and they said that it is generally accepted that anything with a probability of more than 10 to the 12th power is considered mathematically impossible to occur. Is this true?


    No.
  5. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    13 May '12 15:332 edits
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    [b]You write, "Nobody is suggesting that a modern cell just formed “by itself”.

    Does that mean you believe there is intelligence behind its forming?

    What about the first cell that was ever formed, that is, did it just form by itself? Or do you believe there was intelligence behind it? If not, how did it form and gain the ability to reproduce itself without intelligence behind it?[/b]
    You write, "Nobody is suggesting that a modern cell just formed “by itself”.

    Does that mean you believe there is intelligence behind its forming?


    No.

    I took the words “by itself” here in this context to imply the strawman argument that all the molecules just magically and miraculously combined together by pure random accident rather that as a result of the laws of chemistry/physics in the right conditions making the process inevitable.

    What about the first cell that was ever formed, that is, did it just form by itself? Or do you believe there was intelligence behind it?


    if what you mean by “just form by itself” is that all the molecules just magically and miraculously combined together by pure random accident rather that as a result of the laws of chemistry/physics in the right conditions; NEITHER.

    Under the right natural conditions, protocells inevitably would form.
  6. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '12 16:32
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Ok here is the thing.

    If you were to take some complex arrangement of atoms in a molecule (like say DNA) and ask what are the
    odds of a bunch of atoms randomly forming themselves into that pattern then you will get a probability of
    1 in some stupidly large number.


    However that is not how molecules (or DNA) forms.

    Atoms don't just come toge ...[text shortened]... ence of a conspiracy.

    It's not. Unlikely events and coincidences happen all the time.
    The molecules organize themselves in the manner god designed them to organize themselves. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏
  7. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    13 May '12 16:341 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    The molecules organize themselves in the manner god designed them to organize themselves. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏
    Well he did a piss poor job with humans then.

    I could have done better.
  8. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '12 16:35
    Originally posted by humy
    How did atoms form?


    This would, of course, be changing the topic of conversation for he didn't say anything about how atoms themselves form but rather he spoke of how atoms form into molecules i.e. two or more atoms combine together to form molecules.

    But if you want to know how atoms formed; mainly hydrogen was made in the big bang but ...[text shortened]... en escape from exploding stars to then form nebulae, planets, etc and even form yet more stars.
    God formed them. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏
  9. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '12 16:37
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Well he did a piss poor job with humans then.

    I could have done better.
    You could not make one hair on your head. Ignoramus!
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    13 May '12 16:39
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    You could not make one hair on your head. Ignoramus!
    You can't even understand the argument. If I had had the powers your so-called god allegedly has, I could have done LOT better. For instance, built in more compassion into humans, just for starters.
  11. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '12 16:41
    Originally posted by humy
    You write, "Nobody is suggesting that a modern cell just formed “by itself”.

    Does that mean you believe there is intelligence behind its forming?


    No.

    I took the words “by itself” here in this context to imply the strawman argument that all the molecules just magically and miraculously combined together by pure random accident rather ...[text shortened]... conditions; NEITHER.

    Under the right natural conditions, protocells inevitably would form.
    How do the right natural conditions come together without someone directing them? By chance? What is the probability of that happening by chance?
  12. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '12 16:43
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    You can't even understand the argument. If I had had the powers your so-called god allegedly has, I could have done LOT better. For instance, built in more compassion into humans, just for starters.
    It is a good thing you don't have the powers of God. God help us.
  13. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    13 May '12 16:46
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    It is a good thing you don't have the powers of God. God help us.
    Yeah, building in more compassion into humans would have been SO evil.
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '12 17:17
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Yeah, building in more compassion into humans would have been SO evil.
    I am pretty sure you would have screwed it up.
  15. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    13 May '12 17:36
    Originally posted by boonon
    I was listening to a Mathematician the other day and they said that it is generally accepted that anything with a probability of more than 10 to the 12th power is considered mathematically impossible to occur. Is this true?
    No, it is not true. Events with a probability that low occur all the time. There are more planets in the universe than 10 to the 12th power. There are more atoms in the sun than 10 to the 12th power. The universe is a big place.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree