Originally posted by @romans1009If you DO have a response to my post, I'll tackle it.
I was responding to your post. If you have no rebuttal, and it’s apparent you don’t, don’t feel compelled to reply.
Originally posted by @romans1009Most of what you have typed just seems like drivel where you're posting for the sake of posting because you're bored.
I’ve responded to it three or four times. Not sure what you expect.
Originally posted by @fmfThis should have read: I am asking him if he ever ponders whether his intellectual and interpersonal behaviour here is counterproductive in terms of what he sees as his spiritual mission and if he would stop if he ever thought it was. Nobody is going to "Hell", Romans1009.
I am asking him if he ever ponders whether his intellectual and spiritual behaviour here is counterproductive in terms of what he sees as his spiritual mission and if he would stop if he ever thought it was. Nobody is going to "Hell", Romans1009.
Originally posted by @fmfOh and you never do that lol.
Most of what you have typed just seems like drivel where you're posting for the sake of posting because you're bored.
I may have been bored at the time but I responded to your posts. Unfortunately, you got nervous at your contradictory behavior being exposed and started pool whizzing.
Originally posted by @fmfWhether anyone is going to hell isn’t the point and is just a diversion on your part. The point I was making was your contradictory and hypocritical behavior, along with your bizarro obsession over a comment sonship made years ago that stuck in your craw even though you claim his comment was “utter nonsense” and didn’t bother you at all.
This should have read: I am asking him if he ever ponders whether his intellectual and interpersonal behaviour here is counterproductive in terms of what he sees as his spiritual mission and if he would stop if he ever thought it was. Nobody is going to "Hell", Romans1009.
Originally posted by @romans1009This stuff has nothing to do with the question I asked sonship.
Whether anyone is going to hell isn’t the point and is just a diversion on your part. The point I was making was your contradictory and hypocritical behavior, along with your bizarro obsession over a comment sonship made years ago that stuck in your craw even though you claim his comment was “utter nonsense” and didn’t bother you at all.
1 edit
Originally posted by @fmfWell, believe it or not, one can broaden the conversation beyond the OP.
This stuff has nothing to do with the question I asked sonship.
Of course objecting to that is a convenient way to dodge questions and comments you find difficult to address but is certainly preferable to pool whizzing
Originally posted by @romans1009If I find your attempts at "conversation" interesting, I will engage.
Well, believe it or not, one can broaden the conversation beyond the OP.
Originally posted by @fmfYou’ve gotten quite uppity now that your election is all but guaranteed. You’re forgetting that the folks who forced Ghost’s retirement could force yours as well.
If I find your attempts at "conversation" interesting, I will engage.
Your sophisticated, high-end trolling isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, you know. Many prefer the blunt-force trolling Ghost was known for.