Originally posted by 667joeNo you haven't. You have told me only that a prosecutor advised Mother Teresa to return money donated to her. That does not answer any of my questions, which I just posed to you. You certainly do have quite a lot of power to convince me one way or another, if you can simply provide a cogent summary of the contents of those letters.
I suggest you buy the book. I have summarized it as much as I care to. You are certainly free to believe me or not. I have no control over that.
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsIts not making sense to me at the moment. Perhaps I'll clear my mind, take the kids to the circus, and then get back to this seemingly irrelevant piece of crap (I could be wrong), and it's meaning could possibly dawn on me.
He must be in a stupor. If he would look around as soon as he wakes up
in the morning, he should realize everything he sees is made by someone.
He does not have to know exactly who made the things to know they were
made and did not appear like magic or even made itself. If he sees a
painting hung on his bedroom wall, he should know the painting had a
"big bang". But they
have no theory that I am aware of that explains the Uncaused Cause.
Originally posted by Conrau KIf you google Mother Teresa and Charles Keating, the letters from the prosecutor can be found.
No you haven't. You have told me only that a prosecutor advised Mother Teresa to return money donated to her. That does not answer any of my questions, which I just posed to you. You certainly do have quite a lot of power to convince me one way or another, if you can simply provide a cogent summary of the contents of those letters.