Christians ONLY please!!!

Originally posted by David C
So, you're saying Nic is wrong when he states de facto that he knows more about the bible simply because he reads the bible? How interesting. Is this an example of the rational thought you are bestowed with after 'accepting' Jesus?

You are making your own weird conclusions friend. In simple terms I said that knowing the Bible off by heart does not warrant knowing the God of the Bible, as was probably the case with Herr Dan Barker...

Originally posted by dj2becker
You are making your own weird conclusions friend. In simple terms I said that knowing the Bible off by heart does not warrant knowing the God of the Bible.

You just paraphrased my point precisely. Are you having some difficulty comprehending what I'm saying?

Originally posted by David C
You just paraphrased my point precisely. Are you having some difficulty comprehending what I'm saying?

So you agree that Dan Barker did not know the God of the Bible?

Sorry couldn't resist that 😉

Originally posted by David C
You just paraphrased my point precisely. Are you having some difficulty comprehending what I'm saying?

Now seriosuly. You are saying that Dan Barker knows more of the Bible than Nic does eventhough Nic reads the Bible. And I am saying that knowing the Bible more than Nic, does not warrant knowing God. Nic who might know less of the Bible than Dan Barker, may know God whereas Dan Barker may not know God at all.

Is that what you were saying? Then we agree. 😉

Originally posted by dj2becker
In simple terms I said that knowing the Bible off by heart does not warrant knowing the God of the Bible, as was probably the case with Herr Dan Barker...

For pity's sake, dj, look to your grammar. You've just implied that Dan Barker is personnally acquainted with God.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
For pity's sake, dj, look to your grammar. You've just implied that Dan Barker is personnally acquainted with God.

😉 See the edited version. lol

Originally posted by David C
So, you're saying Nic is wrong when he states de facto that he knows more about the bible simply because he reads the bible? How interesting. Is this an example of the rational thought you are bestowed with after 'accepting' Jesus?

When i state i know more than you about the Bible cause i read the Bible and you dont, wouldnt that make the statement true?

Now, if i would read the Bible, wouldnt i be interrested in the contents of the Bible? Why would anyone read any book if they are not interrested in the contents of that book?

I read the Bible, cause of the fact that i can learn from it, i am interrested in it, i love it, and know what God wants me to do wiht it. The Word is God, and God is the Word.

Originally posted by dj2becker
Now seriosuly. You are saying that Dan Barker knows more of the Bible than Nic does eventhough Nic reads the Bible. And I am saying that knowing the Bible more than Nic, does not warrant knowing God. Nic who might know less of the Bible than Dan Barker, may know God whereas Dan Barker may not know God at all.

Is that what you were saying? Then we agree. 😉

Thanks, I like it.