Originally posted by KnightWulfe
How you can pick the parts of the Bible that you like and discard others?
Example - Creationism. The OT clearly explains the origins of the world and its age, yet you discard this (well, many of you do) and embrace this "Intelligent Design" theory. How can you do that? I dont get it.
What nonsense. You seem to be advocating here that the only way a religious Christian can authentically interpret the scripture is literally - which is rather disingenuous for a non-Christian (or so I assume you are) to do, when atheism (or other critics) tries to refute a literal interpretation of scripture.
If one wants to interpret scripture the main point to understand is that the books in the bible were written at different times, in different places, and to different audiences, and not intended for the 21st century where we would be discussing the compatibility of religion and science. Therefore, to understand the meaning of any passage of the bible the context, literary form, socio-historical circumstances and thematic context must be taken into consideration. An understanding of source, text, form and redaction criticism is also needed. This is a vague outline of the mainstream methodology used by the prominent Christian denomination.
As for creationism and Intelligent design, you seem to be confused (the two aren't actually incompatible). All Christian religious accept creationism and intelligent design since they believe that God ultimately created and designed the universe.
Perhaps you mean "young-earth creationists" and "Intelligent Design -to be taught in a science class near you"? However, most Christians reject young-earth creationism, and the push for ID to be taught in science class rooms is exerted by a small but vocal minority (who do not represent any religious authoirty). St.Augustine and St. Iraenius both observed that one cannot literally read the Genesis account since the concept of day and night did not come into existence until the fourth day (verse 14). Other objections to fundamentalist have been that the authors of Genesis did not have the language available to describe the time God used to create the universe, and so assigned each stage of creation to a day - but not specifically to 24 hours.
I don't see how any of this is based on "what you like", it actually seems to be a very logical way to approach any given text.