Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Just what "type of language" is that? Seems like you are essentially saying that the words "ignorant" and "wrongheaded" have no place in discussion. Is that true?
Let's take the word "ignorant". Let's say we're both ignorant about opera (which I am). That'd just be a fact. Can't say that I'd take exception to someone telling me that I'm ignorant about opera when I am. Would you? Seems like only the prideful would do so.
Of course not. The word 'fat' has a legitimate place in discussion, but perhaps not to describe either the bride or groom on their wedding day.
There are many ways you can choose to express yourself. You chose to express yourself in a way that was provocative. You could have simply said that you disagreed and that the evidence gathered supported your view.
If you knew nothing about opera and we were having an argument about opera, I would not call you ignorant, as I can't see that it serves a purpose. I would explain why I thought you were wrong on the basis of my knowledge.
I would have thought your views were more akin to being prideful than mine:
"having or showing arrogant superiority to and disdain of those one views as unworthy".
Calling people ignorant and wrongheaded seems to fall into this camp, wouldn't you say?