Originally posted by vishvahetuAfter starting a thread like this, its no wonder your too embarrased to come back.
This is the last time i am logging on to this chat space.
Its over run by crazy christians, who just spout goobly gook to each other, all day and night.
They cant understand the slightest thing, about the soul and god, because their so indoctrinated with all that goobly gook nonsense.
Anyone who is intelligent, reguards your christian babble as c ...[text shortened]... is a christian.
Do not respond to my post, because i wont be logging on.
cheers vishvahetu
Originally posted by vishvahetuI see that u have other postings in this forum past the date of this post
This is the last time i am logging on to this chat space.
Its over run by crazy christians, who just spout goobly gook to each other, all day and night.
They cant understand the slightest thing, about the soul and god, because their so indoctrinated with all that goobly gook nonsense.
Anyone who is intelligent, reguards your christian babble as c ...[text shortened]... is a christian.
Do not respond to my post, because i wont be logging on.
cheers vishvahetu
Originally posted by RBHILLSo what of it?
I see that u have other postings in this forum past the date of this post
Does he have to apologize or can he continue to keep posting without being hounded for past mistakes?
Its not like vishvas been banned or anything.
He certainly did get up your little kaboodles though, didn't he?
Originally posted by karoly aczelHe doesn't "have" to apologize, but anyone with a modicum of home trraining knows that he should apologize. It would go a long way toward rehabilitating the less-than-stellar opinion other posters have of him.
So what of it?
Does he have to apologize or can he continue to keep posting without being hounded for past mistakes?
Its not like vishvas been banned or anything.
He certainly did get up your little kaboodles though, didn't he?
Originally posted by karoly aczelbasically he promises something he didn't deliver, and hasn't apologized about it. also rumor has it that he never intended to leave in the first place and he only wanted to see how many people would beg him to stay.
So what of it?
Does he have to apologize or can he continue to keep posting without being hounded for past mistakes?
Its not like vishvas been banned or anything.
He certainly did get up your little kaboodles though, didn't he?
odds are he was disappointed.
Originally posted by ZahlanziHe has declared that he will answer "spiritual questions". None were forthcomig.
basically he promises something he didn't deliver, and hasn't apologized about it. also rumor has it that he never intended to leave in the first place and he only wanted to see how many people would beg him to stay.
odds are he was disappointed.
I would've been interested in his answers, not his scources.
Originally posted by PinkFloydAnd I think the christians on this site should be a bit more christian, but I dont get my way, do i?
He doesn't "have" to apologize, but anyone with a modicum of home trraining knows that he should apologize. It would go a long way toward rehabilitating the less-than-stellar opinion other posters have of him.
Originally posted by karoly aczelAbove all else Karoly, the posters on this forum are humans (some of which have Christian beliefs/hopes); and as such they act like humans when some half deranged preacher of self invented 'spirituality' comes along hijacking threads and pontificating insultingly over matters that are far beyond his ken or learning.
And I think the christians on this site should be a bit more christian, but I dont get my way, do i?
I think Zahlanzi nailed it when he/she asserted that Vishva made this thread only to gauge the extend to which people will miss his 'profound' insight and plead with him to stay that little bit longer.
Originally posted by AgergI am not disagreeing with the drama bit. If you like soap operas, then great.
Above all else Karoly, the posters on this forum are [b]humans (some of which have Christian beliefs/hopes); and as such they act like humans when some half deranged preacher of self invented 'spirituality' comes along hijacking threads and pontificating insultingly over matters that are far beyond his ken or learning.
I think Zahlanzi nailed it when he ...[text shortened]... h people will miss his 'profound' insight and plead with him to stay that little bit longer.[/b]
I think "truth" is there for all to be grasped. I try to get into the truth of a debate, into the info. Yeah,I get personal, and all, but I remeber that that is not what matters.
So would you put me in the same category as vishva? Because it certainly sounds like it. I got self-invented spirituality and like to hijack threads. Where would you draw the line? Where should I draw the line? (serious. i respect your views, dear Agerg)
2 edits
Originally posted by karoly aczelI don't think there is a requirement to draw any lines. I acknowledge that you are open minded with respect to matters about spirituality and would draw your inspirations from a number of different genres of belief etc... as you'll acknowledge I lack this disposition.
I am not disagreeing with the drama bit. If you like soap operas, then great.
I think "truth" is there for all to be grasped. I try to get into the truth of a debate, into the info. Yeah,I get personal, and all, but I remeber that that is not what matters.
So would you put me in the same category as vishva? Because it certainly sounds like it. I got s ...[text shortened]... d you draw the line? Where should I draw the line? (serious. i respect your views, dear Agerg)
As for differences between yourself ond Vishva, I fail to recall any matter of discussion where without any reading or education on certain matters you assert with unbreachable confidence that any views counter to yours are flat out wrong. Neither do I recall any lengthy and contiguous series of posts where you denigrate the intellect of individuals or large groups of people for lacking your beliefs. Furthermore, you're willing to concede that there varying degrees of faith underlying your views yet Vishva does not. Most importantly you're willing to engage in debate and discussion, Vishva is willing only to preach.
You mention a number of times in different threads that Vishva is 'baring his soul' and telling his story, and for that we should see some virtue in his posts. I disagree with this; most of us here have been (implicity or explicitly) 'baring our "souls"' as we rack up posts and points of discussion which differentiate our views from others or highlight our own positions of belief or disbelief, and so I argue that your point here is moot.
To finish, I don't put you in any category similar to Vishva other than mutual respect/similarity of belief...I too have come to respect your own views (though I very rarely agree with them!) :]