You can freely download these Creation Seminars by Dr Kent Hovind. For any Bible believing Christians these seminars are a must-see. They are awesome. I could even recommend them to to any hard core evolutionist wrapped in cotton-wool. They are life-changing.
Originally posted by PotatoError [b]Maintaining Creationist Integrity
A response to Kent Hovind http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1011hovind.asp
Especially scroll down to the "Point-by-point response to Kent Hovind’s reply to our ‘Don’t Use’ page"
Ooh looks like a "controversy" in Creationism. Obviously its going to collapse.[/b]
Originally posted by dj2becker Shame. The only tactic you poor guys can use is to try and destroy the man if you cannot refute his arguments. 😴
Don't see any reason to read arguments from somebody that has no creditability. Which dj in all due respect, in science matters, you have very little of too, since you post from so many crackpot sites.
Science doesn't dispute the existence of God, science is absolutly neutral about that. However, what "creation science " does is bring God into the realm of science and there's a very good chance that nobody will be able to "prove" the God Hypothesis.
Believe what you want to believe , leave science alone.
Originally posted by dj2becker You can freely download these Creation Seminars by Dr Kent Hovind. For any Bible believing Christians these seminars are a must-see. They are awesome. I could even recommend them to to any hard core evolutionist wrapped in cotton-wool. They are life-changing.
http://www.biblebelievers.com/hovind/index.html
dj2, I thought you had finally accepted that Kent Hovind is a sham. The last time you started spouting his garbage, we showed you how he has been discredited not only among scientists, but also among fellow creationists. I demonstrated how he was in trouble for dodging his taxes (believing the IRS to be demonic) and how he promotes anti-semetic literature.
I know that you are always happy to find a some one out there who will shares your anti-science view, but you should be more descriminating about with whom you choose to be bedfellows.
Originally posted by telerion dj2, I thought you had finally accepted that Kent Hovind is a sham. The last time you started spouting his garbage, we showed you how he has been discredited not only among scientists, but also among fellow creationists. I demonstrated how he was in trouble for dodging his taxes (believing the IRS to be demonic) and how he promotes anti-semetic literature ...[text shortened]... science view, but you should be more descriminating about with whom you choose to be bedfellows.
You clearly demonstrate that you have never watched his seminars. I suppose you reached a verdict before you even saw it.
Originally posted by telerion dj2, I thought you had finally accepted that Kent Hovind is a sham. The last time you started spouting his garbage, we showed you how he has been discredited not only among scientists, but also among fellow creationists. I demonstrated how he was in trouble for dodging his taxes (believing the IRS to be demonic) and how he promotes anti-semetic literature ...[text shortened]... science view, but you should be more descriminating about with whom you choose to be bedfellows.
wow! I was just reminded that 42=6 x9 ,,, remind me to ask vistesd for the meaning.