Originally posted by CalJust
Nobody can and should pontificate that they are RIGHT, and you are correct to say so. I don't either.
But that does not prevent us from approaching "Rightness" assymptotically, so to speak, by examining facts and evidence and drawing some conclusions.
My question to you was whether you are willing to pursue such an approach, and to see whether your statement that they would not change from one kind to another can be verified.
You have done this with other topics, and you are not wrong to do it either if this is what
you believe. You judge God Word by the views of man, you put more faith in man's theories
than you do the Word of God. So with that you reject out of hand various pieces of
scripture and I guess like others you like.
The one who thinks they are without a doubt correct about things like the distant past,
will have no excuse on all the things they use it to justify themselves. It will be no different
than the one that claims they believe in God and hates people around them, they will
have no excuse.
I believe we will are better off looking at scripture a little differently than that. Can I say
I know without a shadow of doubt that scripture is correct, no I believe you have to take
it on faith. I also believe what man says also will have to be taken on faith, because we
don't know if man is getting it right or not.
We could possibly be missing key pieces of information, we maybe looking at X thinking
it means this instead of that, there are a million ways we can be wrong.