Dive and FMF.

Originally posted by FMF
Your comedy routine needs better material, robbie. You are selling yourself way short with this sub-RJHinds stuff.

Thank you FMF as someone who knows funny and can instruct others on what they may find funny and what they may not find funny I know i can turn to you for advice and support at any time, your fan Robbie.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Thank you FMF as someone who knows funny and can instruct others on what they may find funny and what they may not find funny I know i can turn to you for advice and support at any time, your fan Robbie.

If you are being sincere here, I commend you.

Originally posted by FMF
If you are being sincere here, I commend you.

I do not desire or solicit your commendation, give it to one of your flunkies.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes it can and i have explained why.

It was "a ruse" and not an "opinion". Your own words have established this. No amount of claiming it was an "opinion" can surmount the fact that you have admitted it was a "ruse". I think you've extracted all the laughs ~ such as they are ~ that you're ever going to get out of this. It turns out it was a "ruse". Not your "opinion"

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I do not desire or solicit your commendation, give it to one of your flunkies.

A comedy routines go, this follow up may not have been much of a laugh line. Just saying. 😉

Originally posted by FMF
A comedy routines go, this follow up may not have been much of a laugh line. Just saying. 😉

Yes you seem to be harbouring the delusion that by tediously repeating the same insipid platitudes again and a gain they somehow gather efficacy. Its not very original nor very effective and more a reflection of your own lack of creativity than it is the people you seek to vilify by doing it. Find the tone control somewhere and turn it all they way up.

Originally posted by FMF
It was "a ruse" and not an "opinion". Your own words have established this. No amount of claiming it was an "opinion" can surmount the fact that you have admitted it was a "ruse". I think you've extracted all the laughs ~ such as they are ~ that you're ever going to get out of this. It turns out it was a "ruse". Not your "opinion"

Already explained once and by repeating the same lines again and again you make yourself a rather dull fellow if i am honest. Your guise as a grammar prigg was way more amusing than this, Your posts resemble the kind of monotony one finds in a laundrette, like watching a washing machine wash clothes. I should probably refer to them as wash in future.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I do not desire or solicit your commendation, give it to one of your flunkies.

Well, you commended me for my advice, so I commended you back ~ assuming you were being sincere.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Already explained once and by repeating the same lines again and again you make yourself a rather dull fellow if i am honest. Your guise as a grammar prigg was way more amusing than this, Your posts resemble the kind of monotony one finds in a laundrette, like watching a washing machine wash clothes. I should probably refer to them as wash in future.

It isn't an issue of grammar. It can't have been both your "opinion" and "a ruse". You have admitted it was "a ruse", so there you have it.

Originally posted by FMF
It isn't an issue of grammar. It can't have been both your "opinion" and "a ruse". You have admitted it was "a ruse", so there you have it.

Sigh. . . . . what a hum drum day.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sigh. . . . . what a hum drum day.

You admitting it was "a ruse" and not your honest opinion has got nothing to do with grammar, robbie.

Originally posted by FMF
You admitting it was "a ruse" and not your honest opinion has got nothing to do with grammar, robbie.

Has anyone claimed it has anything to do with grammar, no? then why are you saying they have and why are you making silly arguments on the basis of the fallacy. Please find the tone control on your washing machine FMF and crank it up there, all the way - this logic of yours is just pure wash.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Has anyone claimed it has anything to do with grammar, no?

You have mentioned "grammar" or "grammar prigg" or "grammar troll" or " grammar and syntax prigg" or "priggish grammar troll" over and over and over and over again ~ an extraordinary number of times ~ perhaps you think it's a 'laugh line' (?) ~ over the last 24 hours or so. You keep mentioning "grammar" and "grammar prigg" in post after post after post after post addressed to me, regardless of what I have said to you.

Originally posted by FMF
You have mentioned "grammar" or "grammar prigg" or "grammar troll" or " grammar and syntax prigg" or "priggish grammar troll" over and over and over and over again ~ an extraordinary number of times ~ perhaps you think it's a 'laugh line' (?) ~ over the last 24 hours or so. You keep mentioning "grammar" and "grammar prigg" in post after post after post after post addressed to me, regardless of what I have said to you.

yes I find it highly amusing. It still has got nothing to do with your illogical assertions though.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes I find it highly amusing.

So your amusement has something to do with "grammar", at least in your mind, so that's what it has to do with ~ and so your own question is answered. 🙂