Dive and FMF.

-Removed-

Are you a son of Satan?

-Removed-

are you inebriated? your words don't even make sense, ''true sprite all condition that you do', what is that, what does it even mean?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Dude how can stating an opinion like, no self respecting metal band would appear on top of the pops be a lie? At very best you can disagree, but its an opinion never the less.

That's not the issue. The crux, and what I have been talking about, is whether you were 'mistaken' or you were playing a 'ruse'. You claimed the two weren't mutually exclusive yet when asked to explain how this could be so you refused.

-Removed-

even if we allow room for the typo it still doesn't make any sense - on no i could be turning into FMF some fiendish ol grammar prigg. . . . help me!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
That's not the issue. The crux, and what I have been talking about, is whether you were 'mistaken' or you were playing a 'ruse'. You claimed the two weren't mutually exclusive yet when asked to explain how this could be so you refused.

Ok i am going to explain this to you once and once only, I REPEAT, once only.

If a statement is an opinion then there is the possibility that it could be mistaken after all who can claim absolute certainty and infallibility. If the statement was also made in full knowledge that its intent was to be provocative and a ruse to illicit some kind of response despite its erroneous nature then they claims of mutual exclusion cannot stand for its clear that it can and was both. I have explained it ONCE and I will explain it ONCE only.

-Removed-

Why should they not be, I have met Satanists before, I just thought that maybe you were one of them.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If a statement is an opinion then there is the possibility that it could be mistaken after all who can claim absolute certainty and infallibility. If the statement was also made in full knowledge that its intent was to be provocative and a ruse to illicit some kind of response despite its erroneous nature then they claims of mutual exclusion cannot ...[text shortened]... or its clear that it can and was both. I have explained it ONCE and I will explain it ONCE only.

It can't have been both your "opinion" and "a ruse". Seeing as you have admitted it was "a ruse", then it can't have been your honest "opinion". Nor was it "mistaken", like you claimed as your story shifted; that appears to have been untrue too. As you said, it was just "a ruse" after all.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Why should they not be, I have met Satanists before, I just thought that maybe you were one of them.

Your comedy routine needs better material, robbie. You are selling yourself way short with this sub-RJHinds stuff.

Originally posted by FMF
It can't have been both your "opinion" and "a ruse". Seeing as you have admitted it was "a ruse", then it can't have been your honest "opinion". Nor was it "mistaken", like you claimed as your story shifted; that appears to have been untrue too. As you said, it was just "a ruse" after all.

yes it can and i have explained why.