Originally posted by dottewell
Ah, got it now...













You're a moron.

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
No I'm not I'm just linguistically elaborating to exemplify an explaination that i'm slowly getting very tired of explaining...

Originally posted by Nordlys
Translation: You are just playing around with words you don't understand. Did I get this right?

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
No u didn't , i'm utilising concepts through words that others dont (unfortunately) understand 🙁

Originally posted by dottewell
Your hero, Nietzsche, wrote as clearly as possible because he was desparate to be understood. You write as obscurely as possible because you don't understand.

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
Nietzsche is not my hero...........I really cant believe you guys dont understand the term 'ontological priority'...

Anyway this thread is becoming unutilitarian so I'll leave you 'few' to your semantic games....

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Not only that, but it's lost its servicibility, through the cognition of syntax abuse and interlinear nomial albeitness.

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
Syntax abuse implies misuse of sentence construction, I'm wondering if that really happened or you just jumped on my use of the word 'semantic' and delved into the world of linguistic terminology...How trite of you.............

Originally posted by dottewell
Are you available for children's parties?

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
Do we have ontological priority or do we possess an intrisic morality....
personally I think ontology wins, all we have that's intrinsic is primal urges, the need to procreate etc. Other than that we're a tabla rasa...

I think what he might be asking is something like, are we driven by biological urges alone or is there something else?

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
Please save it for the general forum, this is 'supposed' to be a relatively serious forum...

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
Syntax abuse implies misuse of sentence construction, I'm wondering if that really happened or you just jumped on my use of the word 'semantic' and delved into the world of linguistic terminology...How trite of you.............

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
I am not anti-semantic.

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
Do we have ontological priority or do we possess an intrisic morality....
personally I think ontology wins, all we have that's intrinsic is primal urges, the need to procreate etc. Other than that we're a tabla rasa...