Does anyone belive in the bible literally?

Originally posted by FMF
This post is plagiarized.

It has also been refuted.

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_arguments/magnetic_field.html

Originally posted by FMF
This post is nothing but a spam bomb.

So what. Can you prove it wrong? NO. NO. NO. You can't. 😏

Originally posted by lausey
It has also been refuted.

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_arguments/magnetic_field.html

No it has not. That is only opinion, speculation, and imagination, not science.

Originally posted by RJHinds
So what. Can you prove it wrong? NO. NO. NO. You can't. 😏

It has been refuted, apparently.

Originally posted by RJHinds
No it has not. That is only opinion, speculation, and imagination, not science.

As opposed to what? The 6 Day Creation story?

Originally posted by FMF
It has been refuted, apparently.

APPARENTLY. Is that the proof of refutation I get. How nice. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
APPARENTLY. Is that the proof of refutation I get. How nice. 😏

No. The refutation is the refutation. What parts of the refutation are you able to refute? Be specific.

Originally posted by FMF
As opposed to what? The 6 Day Creation story?

Your so-called refutation requires a lot of faith to believe also since there
is no proof other than APPARENTLY.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Your so-called refutation requires a lot of faith to believe also since there
is no proof other than APPARENTLY.

What parts of the refutation do you feel able to disprove?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I love to read, always have, does that make me a sorcerer too?

You can CALL yourself whatever you like, even Christian.

Originally posted by RJHinds
...there is no proof other than APPARENTLY.

The word "apparently" is not found at http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_arguments/magnetic_field.html

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Southern Baptists are capable of practically anything, best treated like a skillet full of
rattlers! But no, in fact, its anti biblical,

(2 Timothy 2:24-25) . . .But a slave of the Lord does not need to fight, but needs to be
gentle toward all, qualified to teach, keeping himself restrained under evil,  instructing
with mildness those not favorably disposed; . . .

Does this include calling believers "plastic Christians"?

Originally posted by FMF
No. The refutation is the refutation. What parts of the refutation are you able to refute? Be specific.

Why should I even try to refute something that is not a refutation at all.
You yourself describe it as APPARENTLY and to me is apparent to be
an attempt at refutation by those that want the theory of evolution to
be true. It does not even require a refutation until it can be proven that
it is a refutation.

Originally posted by RJHinds
You have the right to see anyone you wish as a hypocrite. But I am not
an evolutionist and do not want to be, so I see no need to read about it,
since I do not intend to prove that theory wrong. I am a creationist and
concentrate on proving creation true because it agrees with my biblical
view. I think the DNA evidence does that. Evolution seems to m ...[text shortened]... ntrue.

P.S. Why would I ask questions on evolution? I already know there is
no such thing.

Creation is true, and evolution is true.

C'mon, expand your mind a little.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Why should I even try to refute something that is not a refutation at all.
You yourself describe it as APPARENTLY and to me is apparent to be
an attempt at refutation by those that want the theory of evolution to
be true. It does not even require a refutation until it can be proven that
it is a refutation.

Is this bravado all you've got to offer?